Exposed as another Spurs fan too pussy to answer the question.
It appears that the "yes" men are winning in this thread, taking the Championship over the 50 win season but it should be assumed that all of the non-respondents stubbornly cast the silent vote of "no" in order to continue the game of message board politics.
they would ing do anything for #5...and I mean anything....they've already hedged their bets on a named RJ or Jefferson...they signed a dude named Splitter...and I said Split-Her...Splitter is literally translated pussy in my language.
Make no mistake...Spur fan crackhead definitely gonna see it coming this year...
It is a stupid thread. That, in itself should tell you how much of a failure you are, asking stupid agenda questions.
Why should I give an answer to a stupid question? Everyone would say yes. In fact, Tim Duncan winning a championship while the team wins 49 games would be an excellent achievement, done by few. In MIB's context, he did not argue about championships. It was just a feat, a tidbit of information that only Shaq and Duncan had achieved, extrapolated with the 1999 season, nothing to do with championships. Winning 50 games and winning a championship are completely 2 separate issues altogether, although still classified under winning. You are just using a poor excuse to lump both these things together.
What is there to expose? You are here to troll. That is the expose.
The problem with it was that it was an argument to try to praise Tim Duncan and put down Kobe, as if the "13 straight 50+ win seasons" is something that most people would concentrate on when comparing the legacies of great players. It's a sidenote to Duncan's legacy, not a defining factor in his greatness compared to other great players.
If I argued Chauncey Billups' greatness compared to the likes of Duncan, Shaq, and Kobe by citing the fact that he led teams to 7 consecutive conference finals in the playoffs, would most people think that achievement puts him in a class above Duncan, Shaq, and Kobe?
That's the problem. MIB used a nice little interesting factoid about Duncan to try to troll Laker fans. In one way, it worked because he got plenty of responses. It doesn't change the fact that it was a pretty stupid thing to bring up to pretend that it separated Duncan from any other player. Not to mention, he inaccurately contended Duncan was the only one when Shaq also did it.
His troll directly resulted in this thread. So where should the blame really be laid?
I agree with everything you said, but MIB's thread was born because of lakaluva's ty thread as well. Countering stupid threads with stupid threads isn't a way to solve anything at all. Some players have different "achievements" from others.
Hey, if the board is so stupid, why not?
Fair point. But pretty much everyone should know by now about lakaluva's troll work.
Maybe that's just me.
Wrong.
When he sets up his position that "Duncan's Spurs ***** on Bean's Legacy and others" based on 13 straight 50 win seasons it is NOT "just a feat, a tidbit of information." Nor should the subject of Championships be ignored.
"Legacy" was the key word in his thread that allows for the inclusion of Championships versus 50 win seasons to take place, unless of course you are rationalizing that winning Championships has no place in a discussion regarding one's legacy.
You are just a typical Spurs homer moron who seeks to protect the political agenda of fellow dildo dipping Spurs s in the name of Duncan.
Sorry, homey don't play that.
He brought up "legacies" and so we're talking "legacies." Next time play close attention to what is actually being said instead and think critically before responding.
Hey Jamstone...I just wanted to point out that the gist of 13 straight seasons of .610 ball came from SLAM.
http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba...10-11-preview/Appreciation is usually something that grows after the fact, and not during. Perhaps that will happen to you with the San Antonio Spurs, or perhaps, it will happen now, as they make what looks to be their final run.
They are a constant in our lives, where striving for continued excellence isn’t merely a cute cliché but in fact an attainted, real thing. What they have done (“they” is perhaps used to broadly here, lets confine it to Tim Duncan, Gregg Popovich, and general manager R.C. Buford) has never been done before: 13 consecutive years of .610 ball or better – .610 cons uting a 50-win season – which is something even the game’s winningest, like Russell’s Celtics or Magic’s Lakers, cannot lay claim to.
It's easy enough to get a shark frenzy by just saying A)The Lakers best player sucks or B) The Spurs Best player ain't as good as the Lakers best player
Even if it's nothing that has ever been achieved in all of sports, they don't see the accomplishment. There is a reason why the regular season is played, isn't there? They keep records of all that for a reason right? Having said that, les matter. I said that too. That's why Bill is the Lord of the Rings. He has the most and achieved one of them as Player-Coach. Something like that, is unheard of nowadays. To you Bill...
The Licker crowd can now get back to their regularly scheduled lovefest.
No, technically...LUVA brought up legacies. Me, I just added on
So Tobey...are you ever going to talk real basketball or is DILDO the extent of what you know and do?
I can confine it to basketball, the question will be...can you?
Anything positive can be a legacy. Kobe Bryant's 81 points is a legacy. Tim Duncan winning 61% of his games is also a legacy. No one argued how much this piece of legacy is worth. If you can't understand troll posts, don't post on Spurstalk. Does Kobe Bryant having 5 rings on Tim Duncan because he has 4? Context wasn't mentioned. If context was, Duncan's "legacy" s on Kobe's.
And of course a Laker fan would bring up the term "dildo". You must have stuck it up your ass often.
Where did you get that MIB completely disregarded championships in "legacy"? Or can't you read?
" " ?
But Tim Duncan IS the most superior basketball player to everyone in his generation... simple as that.
I'd be interested to watch you come up with a legit argument stating otherwise.
It's def NOT KOBE. What happened to Kobe's team once Shaq left? And then what happened to Kobe's team once Pau got there? Don't on Duncan's legacy just because your bean-boy can win a championship with talented bigmen as his sidekicks.
At the feet of Paul Pierce for thinking that Artest would drive.
tee, hee.
I don't know why, but this question scares the out of me
Because most Spurs fans are intellectually dishonest.
But not dishonest to the point where we would stand someone up at a restaurant.
har, har, har.
I take solace in Artest unimploding.
tee, hee.
They actually drafted Splitter, that was before the Gasol trade so i don't expect you to know thatthey would ing do anything for #5...and I mean anything....they've already hedged their bets on a named RJ or Jefferson...they signed a dude named Splitter...and I said Split-Her...Splitter is literally translated pussy in my language.
Make no mistake...Spur fan crackhead definitely gonna see it coming this year...
Trick question meant to find out a general consensus and then flame in a brand new troll thread.
I hope the Spurs get 50 wins, and ring this season. Kobe will definitely fall behind Duncan then. No miracle trade needed by the Spurs to save their franchise. Just nothing but consistent greatness.
was the guy that got punched all there mentally? seriously, did those kids punch a re on camera?
No, technically...LUVA brought up legacies. Me, I just added on
So Tobey...are you ever going to talk real basketball or is DILDO the extent of what you know and do?
I can confine it to basketball, the question will be...can you?
Adding on would have been to add on to his thread.
Your thread set up your position and it's been exposed as troll trash that was rooted in fanboy inspired response to Luva's thread.
I've only been here a couple of weeks but immediately recognize you as the resident Laker fan punching bag. Any time we feel like getting out some aggression and stomping the piss outta a Duncan , we just look for you.
Last edited by history2b; 10-20-2010 at 12:21 PM.
....Mid is pretty handy as well.
tee, hee.
Yup, anything positive can be a legacy... so where did you get confused that talking about championships "had nothing to do" with what MIB brought up in the first place? "Legacy."
Lol @ "No one argued how much this piece of legacy is worth." WTF is wrong with you? Do you do this every time you're shown to be wrong? MIB made his position clear "Duncan ***** on Kobe's legacy," a statement that would lend to the idea that this "little tidbit" actually amounts to a lot in determining how much this piece of legacy is worth.
A man of 1000 rationalizations... awesome.
That would mean something if the Spurs hadn't won 4 les in that span of time. This is a question you should be asking the Maverick fans you ignorant inbred dumb .
But I guess I should've expected such from a post-Gasol Laker got who registered 2 weeks ago and probably doesn't know who James Worthy is.
Lee, gettin' his imploding on.
tee, hee.
Giueseppe, gettin' his lame shtick on.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
