Reply With Quote
I'm sure a viewing of the director's commentary will shut everybody up.
Not necessarily.
But whether he is or isn't makes no difference in the progression of the movie up to that point. It's really, really, REALLY straightforward and linear.
Without being a about it...
Lebomb: if you really want to understand what's happening, think of it like a heist movie. Leo is Danny Ocean, Frenchie is Tess, Dreams are The Bellagio. The details of the plot are more complex, of course, but the basic structure is the same.
I'm sure a viewing of the director's commentary will shut everybody up.
Thanks...........I may give it another chance. One day.
Sure he is. At the homecoming at the end both kids are dressed EXACTLY like they were in his previous dreams. EXACTLY. It was a dream.
There isn't one.I'm sure a viewing of the director's commentary will shut everybody up.
FML I was about to go buy the BR and you tell me there's no ing directors commentary?There isn't one.
Thats some bull right there.
What? No directors commentary? I don't believe that at all. Keep in mind the DVDs and blu-rays you get at redbox aren't the retail versions. I'll have to investigate. I can't see a disc with 50gb capacity NOT have a directors commentary.
There are a lot of extra features -- I don't know how good, since I haven't watched them all yet -- but no commentary.
Makes me glad I pre-ordered through Amazon. With their price guarantee I got the BluRay for just $17.99.
Nolan doesn't want to explain anything about the movie. He didn't do it for Dark Knight either.
No I'm not.
Ah. Just like Lynch doesn't chapter off his films.
I would say that you are; but for thinking there's a definitive answer, not for thinking it was a dream. It's completely ambiguous, quite beautifully so, and I've yet to find anything in four viewings that would hint at one interpretation over the other being the "true" one.
Probably has a lot to do with why there's no commentary.
.............and the confusion.
Here's the ending.
Somebody find the other scene with the kids.
It's not confusing. It's up to your interpretation. There is no definitive answer. What is so ing hard about that? Is that threatening to you? That you might actually have to think?.............and the confusion.
there's nothing really worth "getting"
Nolan's just a hack who tries to hide the pathetic-ness of his story behind layers of convolution and/or other cheap tricks
Not really. Ambiguity =/= confusion..............and the confusion.
There is an unanswered question at the end, but the only people who seem to be confused by it are those who try to make the entire film into a complex, twist-ending, Shyamalan-esque, mind . The film is quite enjoyable even if you take it at face value, as I have chosen to.
Now I actually want to see it.
(can't be worse than Gene Generation)
Yep. I'll be demonoiding tonight.
Do yourself a favor and see it.
Of course the person that knows it all would think they are right over someone that was actually in the movie.
damn, that's some mouth on you, young lady
did you think Animal Farm was about farm animals?.............and the confusion.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
