Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 55 of 55
  1. #51
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    1,029
    [QUOTE=Mel_13;4894617]You brought up Parker's name in this thread, not me.

    You just keep running from point I always make in your "let's get Bargs" posts: He's the face of their franchise on a 50M contract. Even if one assumes that the Spurs have interest, what would they have to give up to get Toronto to make a trade? You keep complaining that I comment on this long-running theme of yours, but you never answer the obvious question with any sort of realistic trade. You're perfectly free to propose that the Spurs trade for Bargs, but if you don't provide good reasons for both teams to make the trade you should expect others to comment on your proposal.

    Still waiting.[/QU tbh its impossible now. A few seasons ago it wouldve worked. Now with bosh gone your right he is untouchable. I knew he would be good but now its obvious to everyone. He is everything that pop wants. I wanted bargs, murphy or love ONLY if pop doesnt play splitter meaningful minutes an bonner keeps getting 23min+ a game. Sadly thats whats happening with pop/bonner/splitter.

  2. #52
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    tbh its impossible now.
    Good to know we've seen the last of the "trade for Bargs" posts.

  3. #53
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    1,029
    [QUOTE=Mel_13;4894808]Good to know we've seen the last of the "trade for Bargs" posts.[ now wait just one minute! I still got my 'parker for calderon' post in my backpocket. Lol

  4. #54
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    [ now wait just one minute! I still got my 'parker for calderon' post in my backpocket. Lol


    touche

  5. #55
    I'm your huckleberry K-State Spur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,810
    Having a flawed defense is ALWAYS UNACCEPATABLE if your serious trying to win a le. Thats why.
    Spurs have been better defensively than the Lakers & Mavs this year.

    The 3 Eastern contenders have been better, but 1) the Spurs would only have to play one of them (if they get that far) and 2) of those 3, only the C's have proven themselves to be able to play that kind of D in the playoffs - and they have more age/injury issues than San Antonio.

    Not saying that the Spurs are the favorites (despite the record) by any juncture, but it's hard not to like how things are unfolding as of today. In a flawed league, there is no reason to harp on the Spurs flaws and ignore those of the compe ion (let Pop handle that).

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •