Reply With Quotenot like we would be giving up much to get the rebound king if the rumors are true
Love is a stat said in all honesty. dude plays on a lottery team where no one cares his stat-oriented style of play. dude looks even better than D-Howard stat-wise but theres sincerely no of way he preponderates Howard
not like we would be giving up much to get the rebound king if the rumors are true
Here we go, now we just need the girl from Juno, and some cables and we ready to roll
plus love plays no D. i'd rather have Blair out there alongside Tim since trigga plays harder and gives protection for Tim. love would be a nice player to have but if it means reshuffling your cards & ruining the team's chemistry, i'd rather call it off.
wolves ain't losing him cheap imho. dudes a 20+15 player this season after all
No reason to make a trade here. Spurs are doing fine.
If the wolves traded Love, I think the remaining few loyal wolves fans up here in Minneapolis would give up on them. Kevin Love is the only reason why most of the wolves fans that I know up here are still following them this season.
Why would the twolves do that..makes no sense that there stacked on guards and right now. Love is better than Blair and Splitter combined unless Kahn thinks Splitter is the next big thing in the nba.
This is the easiest forum in the world for trolling. It works every single time.
Giving up George's perimeter defense is enough for me to veto this deal.
we have 3 guys earning
so we go out to trade for a guy whose looking for a payday
If that trade happens, you are gonna LOVE the game when Love is owned by Lakers bigs.
Love for Bonner! DOooooooooooooo it!
Sounds like a bunch of bull . Horrible trade.
No .Even though this is bull , there are actually people that would be hesitant about this?..
I was thinking after the T-Wolves game that what ever contending team lands K Love, it's gg NBA. This thread made my pants happy.
Throw in Luke Ridnour and you got a deal!
where do I sign?
I don't know about that. Ridnour would be perfect of the bench to replacer Hill. He shoots over 40% from behind the arc. Spurs can't afford to lose both Hill and Blair even though theoretically, Love will outproduce both combined. You still need to fill the void left bu Hill coming off the bench. He can also play the point behind Tony.
Why is this 3 pages?
K-Love is a player you can build around. I just don't see that in Hill even though he occasionally has some nice games.
I'm on the side of those fans who believe giving up Hill is the "deal breaker." IIRC, those 4 games without him earlier this season, we gave up an average of 110.5 a game. That number went way down when he returned. Lose Hill, and there goes our best defender on Kobe. That's some food for thought for an organization who has ridden a "defense-first" mentality to four championships.
I like Blair's energy and hustle, but he has been so inconsistent this season. Love is 5 inches taller AND spreads the floor. I get the feeling some Spurs fans like it simply because it'd make Bonner expendable (even if most of this board doesn't want to admit that Matty has been a HUGE reason why we've pulled out our last two games).
In closing, losing Hill's defense is enough for me to say no to this trade, not to mention we have managed to go 33-6 with Anderson injured and virtually zero contribution from Splitter.
the lakers
Well anderson looked like he had the makings of a pretty good defender IIRC. Either way, don't fix whats not broke. Although I would love to have that beast.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
