Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 53 of 53
  1. #51
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,026
    The process for trying and disposing of combatant cases has been fine until this war.
    The criminal system still works. It was good enough for Ghailani, who was recently found guilty and sentenced in the routine way.

    Obama's predecessor did not decline to keep prosecuting terrorists in the pre 9/11 way. Why should we?

  2. #52
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    I thought they finally would get a fair trial... Oh well... at least if this gets the cases moving again they can maybe appeal to the justice system, much like what happened in the Habeas cases.
    Doesn't matter if they get a fair trial or not. The Obama administration has already asserted they have the right to continue detaining them even if they're acquitted.

  3. #53
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Doesn't matter if they get a fair trial or not. The Obama administration has already asserted they have the right to continue detaining them even if they're acquitted.
    What they say and do are two different things. Originally they said they wouldn't have access to habeas, and once a judge ruled they would, they had to cave. When the discussion shifts from administration-defendant to administration-judicial, that's where the bluffs normally end. As they should.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •