Here's how I look at the Murphy situation. Pop is looking for a big man with 3 qualities to play alongside Duncan: defense, rebounding, reliable long-range jumpshot - basically a Robert Horry type skillset. Let's see how our current bigs not named Duncan stack up:
Blair: Defense Below Average, Rebounding Great, Jumpshot Poor
Bonner: Defense Below Average, Rebounding Poor, Jumpshot Great, including 3 pointers
Dice: Defense Very Good, Rebounding Average, Jumpshot Good, but mid-range only
Basically we have 3 big men who have different and complementary skill-sets but none of them is the total package. Will Murphy be a better bet than any of them?
Murphy: Defense Poor, Rebounding Very Good, Jumpshot Great, including 3 pointers
He fits the bill ideally on 2 out of 3 parameters, and is basically Bonner + rebounding. So while he should beat out Bonner, is he really the answer when matching up vs the Mavs or the Lakers in crunch time? Against the Mavs, he will match up with Dirk who will score all over him. I'd much rather prefer Dice in that role. Against the Lakers, he is a more intriguing match-up as he can keep us afloat on the boards and hit the 3. None of our other bigs is that great at 1-on-1 D on Gasol or Bynum anyway, so he can be more useful in that series than both Blair and Bonner.
The obvious downside is that he doesn't have the chemistry with our guys and more importantly, has zero playoff experience. There is a good chance that the stage might be too big for him - in which case we go back to Plan Ginger. Bottomline: he can help in some situations, and we aren't losing anything by having an extra option.

Reply With Quote