In game 3 both Randolph and Gasol played 40min. I don't think Duncan or Splitter could play that many minutes.
the round mound of no rings.
I could go with that, good point elaborating on the matchups.
Now, someone get Pop on the phone and tell him AHF and Obstructed_View have a plan![]()
Damn, subconsciously was already looking ahead to our next win.
In a weird way the Spurs chances of winning number five have just gotten better. If we continued what we were doing we would have been demolished in the future. Now we are playing an inexperienced Splitter and I still think that is a better option than Blair. If we weren't in this current situation we would continue to play uninspired basketball. If we did overcome the players will have a hunger in them that they never had before.
Of course I wouldn't bet on the Spurs to win this series but in twisted way the Spurs now indeed do have a better chance at winning a ring. At the very least we would be able to put up a better fight than we would have been able to do without the current cir stances.
With all due respect, why the not?? What's the point of limiting Duncan's minutes to a career low if he can't go for 40 minutes in an elimination game? And Splitter has been literally resting for the entire season. Don't run a single, solitary offensive play for either of them aside from pick and rolls and let them do what they do on defense.
They'll have the whole summer to rest so I don't see why they can't (more realistically 36 mins). Splitter's minutes would have to be broken up and rests maximized with time-outs (planned ahead) as he's not used to playing that many minutes. That leaves 24 mins. of Dice/Bonner/Blair (preferably Dice). Ray Allen and Paul Pierce routinely play 40 mins. in big (regular season) games.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)