Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 124
  1. #51
    Believe. Interrohater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    1,602
    Nice sig, Ace. I didn't understand the 'human avatar' nickname until I saw that pic. That's a ridiculous wingspan and his hands are like tennis racquets

  2. #52
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    Pass on Outlaw. Plus, we already drafted a much better version of him in Leonard.

  3. #53
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Post Count
    863
    Jefferson wipes his ing ass with Travis Outlaw. Give me a break. Travis Outlaw's contract last year was the laughing stock of the league.

  4. #54
    Realistic Spurs Fan Amuseddaysleeper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    17,732
    Jefferson wipes his ing ass with Travis Outlaw. Give me a break. Travis Outlaw's contract last year was the laughing stock of the league after Jefferson's.

  5. #55
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    RJ is 31 years old and has $30.5M/3 years left on his contract.
    Outlaw is 27 years old and has $28M/4 years left on his contract.

    No need to say more.

  6. #56
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    Dont think the contracts match? T-Out is making the MLE IIRC.

  7. #57
    Believe. Cessation's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Post Count
    2,896
    What's the point of having a running offence, if in the playoffs halfcourt would dominate. Assuming your goal is to be a le contender, and not just a regular season champ.

  8. #58
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    I would do this just because I feel about Jefferson the exact same way I feel about Bonner. I simply don't want to see either one on the floor as a Spur anymore. I don't want to see if they can change their game, or do better next year. I don't even want them to have a chance (at least, not in this orgo).

    In fact, I'm afraid that they will do the exact same thing they did this season, which is show up for the first part of the regular season to engrave themselves into the rotation, then they quickly revert back to the perennial playoff pussies that we have all come to expect.

    Outlaw may or may not be a change for the better, but at least I wouldn't feel like I was watching the same crappy movie over again. As for Bonner, pretty sure a sequel is already being planned for next spring.
    You sir are correct...in every way.
    RJ is 31 years old and has $30.5M/3 years left on his contract.
    Outlaw is 27 years old and has $28M/4 years left on his contract.

    No need to say more.
    Outlaw's contract is also a flat structure. Those types of contracts are much easier to move if the Spurs want to get out from under him after next season.

  9. #59
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Post Count
    863
    Pass on Outlaw. Plus, we already drafted a much better version of him in Leonard.
    lol Awful, absolutely awful comparison, tbh.

  10. #60
    Mike Davis = BOSS DirkDoesWork's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Post Count
    192
    If I were a Spurs fan, I'd be willing to trade and his horrible contract for just about any breathing SF.

  11. #61
    Don't believe the hype... ChuckD's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    4,510
    You sir are correct...in every way.

    Outlaw's contract is also a flat structure. Those types of contracts are much easier to move if the Spurs want to get out from under him after next season.
    If the NBA puts in a hard cap, both contracts will be radioactive beyond belief. I'll take 3 years over 4, in that case.

  12. #62
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    True...but I won't actually believe a hard cap is happening until the ink is dry on the paper.

  13. #63
    Don't believe the hype... ChuckD's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    4,510
    True...but I won't actually believe a hard cap is happening until the ink is dry on the paper.
    You realize that the owners pulled all of their offers, and are back to the $45M hard cap now, didn't you? It happened when the lockout did.

  14. #64
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    And? That means nothing. That's what you do when you play hard ball in negotiations. The NBA will lose a whole season before the players agree to a hard cap...especially one that low. They will meet in the middle somewhere.

  15. #65
    real fans go bald mountainballer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    3,238
    If the NBA puts in a hard cap, both contracts will be radioactive beyond belief. I'll take 3 years over 4, in that case.
    if they put in a hard cap, there will be a multiple years procedure that considers those contracts. it will be in the interest of most of the owners as well (it's in the interest of the players anyhow), they are not interested in taking away any flexibility for 3 or 4 yeas from the teams that currently have several long term contracts.
    so the question, if Outlaw has one more years on his contract isn't the major issue IMO. the question, if he is a player the Spurs should want at all, that's the point. he likely isn't and fans might hate him more than RJ soon. however, such a trade scenario can still be rated as "realistic" when it comes to the question, if the other team would do it. (as opposed to 99% of the ST trade proposals)

  16. #66
    I'm poplovin' it! TJastal's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    7,725
    I hear your reasons and somehow agree, but this point is nonsense. he left 15 million on the table and got back 39 million in guaranteed money. he knew very well, that in 2011 he will have a hard time to find a team that offers him 24 million guaranteed money. and this doesn't even consider a possible lock out.
    so yes, it helped the Spurs short term that he opted out, but it was a very good deal for RJ in the long run and for sure "help the team" wasn't the major reason to do so.
    Most of his "points" have been complete bunk.. Like calling Pop an "Elite" coach because the spurs were the oldest team in the league.

    Makes for entertaining reading nonetheless.

  17. #67
    Don't believe the hype... ChuckD's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    4,510
    And? That means nothing. That's what you do when you play hard ball in negotiations. The NBA will lose a whole season before the players agree to a hard cap...especially one that low. They will meet in the middle somewhere.
    A lot of folks think there will be a lost season. Once the players are locked out, the owners have the position of strength. Their expenses are very low, and there are 20-something of them who feel it's better not to do business at all than to continue under the current runaway soft cap model.

  18. #68
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,019
    I don't care about trades that don't make us contenders for the le. If you just want to see different faces, trade anyone for anyone.
    I agree here. The problem is that the "trade y-J" camp doesn't understand that there is no trade involving Jefferson that will turn us into contenders. Not one.

    While I think you are 100% correct, it doesn't mean the FO shouldn't try.

    There are many other teams that RJ would do much better in - Suns, Clippers, Golden State, New Orleans, Orlando...many others. Some have SFs of their own, others don't want to take the risk on RJ. Regardless, almost all players want to be in systems which THEY are featured and RJ is no different.

    TP, in somewhat the same fashion, really seems to be like a better fit elsewhere. LA, NY, Chicago - some major city (he'd be REALLY good on the Heat). But, out of loyalty and love for the city, he doesn't cause a ruckus about being traded when the Spurs are clearly in decline - save a couple of mistimed quotes.

    My whole point is that the Big 3 has about 2% chance of realistically winning a championship. And, given those chances, I'm not all for putting up a good fight or having a great regular season record or even losing in the Western Conf finals. I want to see them in the FINALS.

    Honestly, what good is having the Big 3 intact for another year only to lose early in the Playoffs and be that much further away from contending in the future.

    So, why not trade TP to better pastures for a younger big man and/or draft picks? What about a different style of offense? How about keeping everything the way it is, just play/start the younger players to see what we got?

    Viva Los Spurs in 2016.
    Good thoughts, but see my post above. You can apply that rule to TP as well.

    I don't think a big 2 with or without RJ wins anything tbh. The Spurs are simply looking to soften the landing after Timmy and Manu walk away.
    Last edited by Agloco; 07-05-2011 at 09:04 AM.

  19. #69
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    A lot of folks think there will be a lost season. Once the players are locked out, the owners have the position of strength. Their expenses are very low, and there are 20-something of them who feel it's better not to do business at all than to continue under the current runaway soft cap model.
    The door swings both ways...it's not like the players are broke or will hurt for money by losing a season. I think it's much more even than you think...but this is a discussion for another thread.

    No matter what happens with the lockout, Outlaw's contract is easier on the Spurs even though it's a year longer. Not only is it cheaper overall, but the Spurs would save quite a bit of money in each of the remaining years that would have run the course of RJ's contract...2.3 million next season, 3.1 million in '12-'13 and 4 million in '13-'14. If the hard cap is coming as you say it is, those numbers become much bigger than they were in the soft cap days.

  20. #70
    Believe. CaptainLate's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    868
    Outlaw for Jefferson wouldn't improve the team whatsoever.
    Disagree. It's called addition by subtraction. RJ is taking up a youngster's minutes.

    Most people thought he would be a good fit. , when the trade happened, Vitale was saying "give next season's le to the Spurs". He wasn't even a good fit in year #2 with the team, when almost everyone else we've brought onboard has "gotten it" by that time. He even had a summer of tutelage under Pop.

    It's time to cut our losses. Get anything in return...and trade TP to a 2021 lottery team.

  21. #71
    REVENGE Avitus1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    3,579
    I'd trade RJ for pretty much anything at this point. The dude is over paid and sucks.

  22. #72
    Spur Forever urunobili's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    14,291
    I have wanted Outlaw in the Spurs for like 3, 4 years. I would welcome this.

  23. #73
    Realistic Spurs Fan Amuseddaysleeper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    17,732
    Disagree. It's called addition by subtraction. RJ is taking up a youngster's minutes.
    Bingo. RJ just hurts the team plain and simple. He's useless, and like Bonner he was getting too many minutes. I would love to have Leonard force fed minutes to begin the season along with Splitter.

    I know RJ barely played in Game 6 against the Grizz, so obviously the Spurs want to get rid of him. I think we'd have a better chance of getting rid of RJ via amnesty, but I don't know if Holt would be willing to go that route.

  24. #74
    Drive For FIVE Spurologist's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    14,750
    I have wanted Outlaw in the Spurs for like 3, 4 years. I would welcome this.

  25. #75
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Post Count
    863
    Disagree. It's called addition by subtraction. RJ is taking up a youngster's minutes.

    Most people thought he would be a good fit. , when the trade happened, Vitale was saying "give next season's le to the Spurs". He wasn't even a good fit in year #2 with the team, when almost everyone else we've brought onboard has "gotten it" by that time. He even had a summer of tutelage under Pop.

    It's time to cut our losses. Get anything in return...and trade TP to a 2021 lottery team.
    I was one of the few people who cautioned that the Jefferson signing wasn't a great one. That being said, I give Jefferson all of the props in the world for his season last year. Popo threatened to completely ruin this guy. He's made Jefferson completely change his game and hasn't done anything to help him at all. Jefferson has never been strictly a spotup shooter, and that's what he's been made to be. Last year, he completely changed his game and did that great. I give him major props for that.

    Did he have a bad playoffs? Absolutely. Is he entirely to blame for that? Absolutely not. Popo going into panic mode, changing rotations and giving players sporadic minutes is mostly to blame. I don't care if you're a YMCA player or an NBA player, nobody can be expected to perform in that situation.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •