Isn't today the anniversary of the end of prohibition?
What does anyone do that doesn't affect others? That's not a realistic goal.
Making drugs legal would DRASTICALLY reduce the affect that drug use by an individual has on others. Anything that is traded on any black market automatically draws and incites violence by it's very nature. People don't have gunfights over the sale and distribution of alcohol, but they used to during prohibition.
Quit acting stupid. I've already said multiple times in this thread that I support legalizing meth and then cutting off all meth addicts. The "I don't want addicts living off my tax dollars!" argument Republicans love to use when saying drugs should be kept illegal is dumb, no one ever said we should legalize drugs and then use tax dollars to support the addicts, it's a strawman argument you guys use for whatever reason because you deep down want to control what people do to their bodies.
You're not addressing what I'm saying.
18-21 year olds in nearly every European country CAN go buy alcohol conveniently with no middle man, American 18-21 year olds cannot, by your logic that means European 18-21 year olds should have more of an alcohol problem than American 18-21 year olds when it's the exact opposite.
I've never met a Jew with the subpar intelligence you have tbh.
It's funny all these Republicans who claim to be about "smaller government!" think the "smaller government" they support should still have the power to tell people what they can/cannot do to their bodies. If you really were about personal responsibility, you wouldn't want the government keeping drugs illegal and spending billions to enforce laws and help addicts who can't help themselves.
From what I can see Ron Paul is the only Republican running who truly believes in smaller government.
doesn't matter with alcohol, already explained that before. siblings and willing-to-help-get-you-drunk parents are many in the states. older siblings and accommodating parents aren't middlmen. alcohol might as well me legal here to 18-21 year olds. all you have to do is go to any weekend high school or college party to find that out.
all you would be doing is sending a message to more young kids that these dangerous drugs are alright. of course that's not what illegalization would be advocating but that's how kid would take it. it might not effect adult population that much but the youth would get the wrong idea about it.
Too bad alcohol isn't illegal. I definitely let alcohol get in the way sometimes of being productive.
Tbh, we spend more tax dollars supporting prescription drug abusers (we even pay for the drugs) than we do illegal drug abusers. Every other woman over 45 is on some kind of prescription pain med, and a load of them are chasing it with alcohol.
And I am all about not telling anyone what they can do with their own bodies, but I am also all about letting these ers die in their own excrement before I would toss a quarter at them.
You cannot have it both ways, where you get to tweak off and I get to pay for it.
In fact, it's just basic common sense that intervention and help isn't a spigot you can turn on and off at your leisure. If you want a system that is built around helping people, you need to accept that someone is going to control aspects of your life, because obviously you need it and asked for it.
They beg to differ.
Tee, hee
It's not illegal to chug laundry detergent, that means the government must besending a message that chugging laundry detergent is alright
Why do all people who support illegal drugs suck at reading? I said multiple times I support legalizing all drugs AND letting all the junkies die.
You are such a pussy it's unreal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
