Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 63 of 63
  1. #51
    hasta la victoria, siempre cheguevara's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    9,763
    Paul would get 10%+ as 3rd party. It would be Armageddon for both Dems, Reps. Not gonna happen.

    Paul would get assassinated before he tries to go 3rd party

  2. #52
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Most Taboo Topic at the GOP Debates: George W. Bush

    George W. Bush? Who?

    You’d think that the last Republican president — remember, that two-termer who’s only been out of the White House a scant three years — might come up frequently.

    Not so. In fact, George W. Bush is the invisible man of the GOP race, the all-but-forgotten Ghost of Administrations Past. He’s its “He Who Should Not be Named,” in Harry Potter parlance.

    most Americans still hold Bush responsible for the sorry state of the American economy.

    From Dems’ perspective, there’s value in reminding voters that Bush is responsible for nearly all of the messes Obama is trying to clean up, and nearly all of the Republican candidates are eager to bring return to Bush-era policies — only this time, they’ll be even more right wing.

    From journalists’ perspective, there’s no reason to play along with the GOP’s willingness to erase Bush from the larger discussion. Indeed, there are some pretty straightforward questions the Republican field should be forced to answer: Do you believe the Bush presidency was a success? How would your agenda differ from Bush’s if you’re elected?

    http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews...sh/#paragraph5

    Repugs betting their stupid, ignorant, racist, pissed-off base of Fox watchers forget how horrendously, murderously bad is Repug willful and/or incompetent mis-governance. Actually, it's a damn good bet.

  3. #53
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    If Paul ran, all it meant is that no one would get the popular vote. Since there are
    more states that don't give all their electorates to one candidate, then maybe someone doesn't even get to the magical number and therefore it would go to the house, right? Or Paul could trade his electors to the candidate that agrees to more of his platform. Is that legal or have they made laws agianst all that?

    FWIW I rather have Obama as a president with a majority GOP Congress.

  4. #54
    hasta la victoria, siempre cheguevara's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    9,763
    FWIW I rather have Obama as a president with a majority GOP Congress.
    what has that accomplished the last 2 years?

  5. #55
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    FWIW I rather have Obama as a president with a majority GOP Congress.
    As long as the GOP retains one house, Obama can't harm this nation any more than anyone else. I still want to see him out though. The democrats proved how destructive they are with the House, Senate, and Presidency.

  6. #56
    U have my perm. to die The Batman's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    1,398
    As long as the GOP retains one house, Obama can't harm this nation any more than anyone else. I still want to see him out though. The democrats proved how destructive they are with the House, Senate, and Presidency.
    Who currently has control of the house?

  7. #57
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    The polls show if Paul ran as a 3rd party against Obama and Romney, then Obama would win easily.
    Link?

  8. #58
    Veteran
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    8,957
    If Ron Paul ran as a 3rd party candidate, how well would he do?
    I think he would do better than Ralph Nader in 2000 but probably not as good as Ross Perot in 1992. It would be cool if Ron Paul did it. He would piss off a lot of people if he ran as a 3rd party candidate.

  9. #59
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    If Ron Paul ran as a 3rd party candidate, how well would he do?
    I think he would do better than Ralph Nader in 2000 but probably not as good as Ross Perot in 1992. It would be cool if Ron Paul did it. He would piss off a lot of people if he ran as a 3rd party candidate.
    Perot lost a great deal of his support when he was out of the race and in again. I wonder how much better he could have done if he didn't portray himself as yellow.

  10. #60
    I can live with it JoeChalupa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    21,547
    Another one tonight and Romney better step up to the plate and knock it out of the park. Gingrich will be ready with some good one-liners to keep his supporters excited.

  11. #61
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    one-liners make great national and foreign policy

  12. #62
    Boring = 4 Rings SA210's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    14,286
    one-liners make great national and foreign policy
    That's been my point exactly

  13. #63
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    They won't talking about REAL PROBLEMS like the job creation or the mortgage crisis.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •