It's all because of this man.
Ooh, sorry wrong guy named Freeze.
What I really meant was FRIESE
http://www.forbes.com/sites/seankila...he-full-story/
Seems like ol' Frothy got himself a billionaire backer.
Or maybe the billionaire is buying himself a candidate.
If this doesn't concern you then you aren't paying attention.
there couldn't possibly be any drawbacks to a system where one tremendously rich guy bankrolls a candidate all by himself
Santorum
What’s left is the government that gives you right, what’s left are no unalienable rights, what’s left is a government that will tell you who you are, what you’ll do and when you’ll do it. What’s left in France became the guillotine. Ladies and gentlemen, we’re a long way from that, but if we do and follow the path of President Obama and his overt hostility to faith in America, then we are headed down that road.
Santorum Doubles Down: ‘ObamaCare’ Is The First Step To The ‘Guillotine’
SANTORUM: It was a secular revolution on which we relied on the goodness of eacother. This is the left’s view of where America should go. And of course where did France go? To the guillotine. To tyranny. If there are no rights that government needs to respect, then what we see with ObamaCare is just the beginning of what government will do to you.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/20...he-guillotine/
=====
InSaneTorum, ing nutcase who will say any damn thing that poops into his screwed up brain.
Santorum is tearing it up speaking at CPAC. Throwing a few jabs at Romney and really hitting Obama hard. The crowd is loving it.
"Muslims hate us cause we're the good guys"
Santorum says no to women in combat because they might compromise the missions
Rick Santorum raised some eyebrows by saying women should not be in combat because of the “the types of emotions involved.” Now, Santorum says, he is also concerned about “physical strength and capability” of women in combat situations.
First, on those “emotions,” Santorum says he was not talking about the emotions of women.
“I was talking about men’s emotional issues; not women,” Santorum told ABC News. “I mean, there’s a lot of issues. That’s just one of them.”
What emotional issues? Santorum says he believes that the men serving with women would put the protection of women in their unit above the overall the mission.
“So my concern is being in combat in that situation instead of being focused on the mission, they may be more concerned with protecting someone who may be in a vulnerable position, a woman in a vulnerable position,” Santorum said.
But Santorum says he is concerned about more than just the “emotional issues.”
“You throw on top of that just simply physical strength and capability and you may be out there on a mission where it’s you and a woman and if you’re injured, the ability to transport that person back. And you know, there’s just, there are physical limitations,” Santorum said.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...tional-issues/
the emotions. what a ing nutbag
if she passed all the physical tests and training she was as much right to die as a man. El Che has fought with women alongside. They are great.
"The (CPAC) crowd is loving it."
nutcases cheering the nutcase. self-indicting all around
Is there anything anywhere near as nasty as CPAC on the Dem side? no.
http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/cpac...sts/singleton/GOProud, the gay Republican group that was founded because the Log Cabin Republicans were considered too concerned about gay civil rights and not sufficiently focused on “fiscal issues,” is not invited this year, because they are too “aggressive” about being gay, which made Jim DeMint uncomfortable.
CPAC also uninvited the John Birch Society, which had made a triumphant return to mainstream conservative acceptance in 2010, when they co-sponsored the conference.
But! While the Birchers and the open sexualists are no longer welcome, there is still room for multiple outspoken white nationalists!
The National Review’s John Derbyshire, a stock “pervert Tory” character from a Martin Amis novel sprung to life and given a sinecure at the National Review, is hosting a panel on “multiculturalism” (boo hiss) featuring two of America’s most detestable sacks of : Peter Brimelow, founder of white supremacist site VDARE, and Robert Vandervoort, the director of some sort of “don’t make me press one for English” nativist group and a white nationalist from way back.
https://twitter.com/#!/DavidCornDC/s...93967848329217@DavidCornDC David Corn
Santorum #CPAC introducer opens w/ joke: A conservative, a moderate, & a liberal walks into a bar, and the bartender says, "Hi, Mitt."
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...y-in-michigan/
(CNN) - It's the state where Mitt Romney grew up and where his father served as governor in the 1960's, but a new poll in Michigan indicates that Rick Santorum is on top in the race for the Republican presidential nomination.Michigan and Arizona are next up in the primary and caucus calendar, with both states holding primaries on February 28. The 30 delegates up for grabs in Michigan will be divided proportionally, while the 29 delegates at stake in Arizona are winner take all.
Romney won the 2008 Republican contest in Michigan, edging out eventual GOP nominee Sen. John McCain of Arizona by nine points. But four years later, the Santorum campaign feels they can be compe ive in Michigan, as well as Ohio, which votes on Super Tuesday on March 6. Both states are considered part of the Rust Belt, with larger working class populations and strong Catholic communities, which may favor Santorum over Romney.
According to the poll, 37% of self-described supporters of the tea party movement say they support Santorum, with 29% backing Gingrich, 17% supporting Romney and 11% backing Paul. Among people who are not backers of the tea party, or who are unsure about the movement, 35% back Romney, with Santorum at 30%, Gingrich at 14% and Paul at 13%.
The survey indicates that Santorum edges out Romney 33%-28% among male voters, with Romney topping Santorum 39%-33% among female voters.
The American Research Group poll was conducted February 11-12, with 600 likely Michigan GOP primary voters questioned by telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus four percentage points.
~~Rick's message is starting to catch on. Will he be the last GOP candidate to rise and fall against Willard?
According to an American Research Group survey released Monday, 33% of likely Michigan GOP primary voters say they are backing Santorum, the former senator from Pennsylvania, with 27% supporting Romney, the former Massachusetts governor. Twenty-one percent are backing former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, 12% are supporting Rep. Ron Paul of Texas and 6% are undecided. Santorum's advantage is technically within the poll's sampling error.
Ron Paul says Santorum can't beat Obama.
Contraception’s Con Men
Rick Santorum is a nice smiley fanatic. He does not believe in evolution or global warming or women in the workplace. He equates gay sex with bestiality (Rick “Man on Dog” Santorum). He equates contraception with the guillotine. Only a brain-dead party could think him a worthy presidential candidate. Yet he is praised by television pundits, night and day, for being “sincere” and “standing by what he believes.” He is the principled alternative to the evil Moderation of Mitt Romney and the evil Evil of Newt Gingrich. He is presented as a model Catholic. Torquemada was, in that sense, a model Catholic. Messrs. Boehner and McConnell call him a martyr to religious freedom. A young priest I saw on television, modeling himself on his hero Santorum, said, “I would rather die than give up my church’s principles.” What we are seeing is not a defense of undying principle but a stampede toward a temporarily exploitable lunacy. Acton to the rescue!
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog...ption-con-men/
He can't. If the economy keeps improving for the rest of the year, it'll be tough for anybody to beat Obama, but Santorum is a mental midget who's arguments are based entirely off appealing to emotion. Obama would trounce him in debates.
But Santorum is the upstanding Christian. Why does Obama hate god by trouncing him in debates?
Santorum: Mainline Protestant Churches Are in the Grip of Satan
then there is this Santorum assessment of mainline Protestantism:
[O]nce the colleges fell and those who were being educated in our ins utions, the next was the church. Now you'd say, 'wait, the Catholic Church'? No. We all know that this country was founded on a Judeo-Christian ethic but the Judeo-Christian ethic was a Protestant Judeo-Christian ethic, sure the Catholics had some influence, but this was a Protestant country and the Protestant ethic, mainstream, mainline Protestantism, and of course we look at the shape of mainline Protestantism in this country and it is in shambles, it is gone from the world of Christianity as I see it.
http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews...an/#paragraph3
...
Last edited by boutons_deux; 02-20-2012 at 02:02 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
.jpg)
Reply With Quote