Reply With QuoteNo one batted 1.000, but that's back to Monday morning QBing.
Did I say they were correct pre-9/11?
No one batted 1.000, but that's back to Monday morning QBing.
Don't you see the logic? Saddam might have had some WMDs and might have been thinking about trying to get some. That's why we had to invade Iraq, All these other despots in the world are nice people who wouldn't anything to do with WMDs. And of course, if we think that they are thinking about it, we'll invade and occupy them, too, no problem.
He used them before. He has acquired and developed them before. Etc. He was beginning to support militant Islamic terrorism both rhetorically and financially. Bin Laden and the mujhadeen had no problem taking American support in the 1980s when they were fighting a common enemy. Why would this situation be any different?
But I know. Let's not be proactive. Let's wait to be hit in a really spectacular way again because then we would be 100% justified.
After all, I am sure you would have supported a pre-9/11 invasion of Afghanistan.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions