Yes, so I can more easily determine sock puppet accounts. It is interesting how you picked up where RG left off.
That's exactly why it is completely irrelevant.
You haven't explained why you made that logical fallacy in the first place when you didn't have the information you proved you needed by immediately asking for it in the next post.Do you or have you used marijuana?
I would have answered this question with an immediate NO but I am not an addict.
Just say you made an error in posting that logical fallacy and we can move on.
Incorrect, it could explain why he choose to assault Zimmerman.
I am not playing rhetorical games, I am asking you a question,
Do you or have you used marijuana?
I've already stated why.
So you are not providing information at all. You are speculating and making things up.
I am asking you a question.I am not playing rhetorical games, I am asking you a question,
Do you or have you used marijuana?
Why did you make that logical fallacy in the first place when you did not have the information?
More speculation.
You look really bad right now.
It is not speculation that he was suspended multiple times, one for possession of traces of marijuana. If it was my son, I would immediately request medical testing to show that he had not used marijuana. Has this been done? I have extensive experience with drug addicts and their denial. This information is important for determine the character of Trayvon which appears to be very different then what is being stated about him by his supporters.
Keep dodging,
Do you or have you used marijuana?
It is important for you to assassinate the character of Trayvon because it suits you.
Sorry, there's no need to facilitate more logical fallacies from you if you won't admit the ones you made in the first place.Keep dodging,
Do you or have you used marijuana?
Besides -- I asked first. Quit dodging.
Only Trayvon's previous actions can determine his actual character.
I already stated it was an assumption. Now prove me wrong,
Do you or have you used marijuana?
Which is why speculating only proves you are trying to assassinate his character.
No, it's a logical fallacy.I already stated it was an assumption.
State you made a logical fallacy.
What did I state about Trayvon that was factually inaccurate?
Incorrect, it is an educated guess,
Do you or have you used marijuana?
I will take your failure to defend your reputation as acknowledgement that you have used or do use marijuana.
You think I'm RG?
paranoia
ing about bringing something to the "debate" while asking the same strawman over and over again
I have no idea who you are, that was my point. Without seeing your IP address I cannot rule out sock puppet accounts.
Do you or have you used marijuana?
You can't rule out your paranoia either
Have you made a point yet?
I do not use marijuana so I am not paranoid.
Yes, those who are not addicts immediately answer the question "NO",
Do you or have you used marijuana?
But you think a poster with 48,000+ posts is a sock puppet account because you're stupid...
...and paranoid
Have you made a point yet?
I have no idea which account is a sock puppet for who.
Yes, those who are not addicts immediately answer the question "NO",
Do you or have you used marijuana?
But you would love to find out because you're paranoid
Have you made a point yet?
You know Poptech, the marijuana issue isn't looking good for you. Since you are dealing with people who lack integrity, and like to play games, it isn't going to go where you think.
We're talking about your speculation. Stay on point.
Incorrect. It's a logical fallacy. There is nothing educated about your logical fallacy making. You're actually displaying a decided ignorance concerning logical fallacies.Incorrect, it is an educated guess
For someone who started a thread accusing others of such fallacies, you're really being a hypocrite here.
It still won't make you logical fallacy anything but a logical fallacy.I will take your failure to defend your reputation as acknowledgement that you have used or do use marijuana.
lol sock puppets
"Yes, those who are not addicts immediately answer the question "NO",
Do you or have you used marijuana?"
Oooohhhh...another tautological event.
Those who are not addicts answer NO. Ergo, if you answer yes you are an addict.
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
got it.
lol... a 17 year old character is defined prior to him being a legal adult..because he smoked a dooby..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
