STFU clown!
You predicted that the SPurs would lose every ing series since 2004 . . . and they won two rings since then, and have a pretty damm good shot at winning one more this year.
This thread heading into tucks territory.
STFU clown!
You predicted that the SPurs would lose every ing series since 2004 . . . and they won two rings since then, and have a pretty damm good shot at winning one more this year.
The Spurs have been tested.
The secret elixir of Kobe Bryant's bitter salty tears tipped the game.
You know its pretty sad when a baseball broadcaster has a better take than a supposed NBA play by play guy.
I was watching the Red Sox vs Rays game sunday afternoon and they were talking how the Spurs were this and that and how Pop was managing the team.
When the baseball people style on you, than you know you're not doing it right.
If that's true, then this series is already over.
We'll see.
Are you sad 'cause the Thunder lost, ddd?
I was concerned. Don't remember doubting, tbh. Maybe I did; guess you can go back to the tape.
I admit to being wrong all the time. Did you miss my guarantee of the Grizzlies winning Game 7 and the subsequent thread? That was a hilariously wrong, tbh.
I was also pretty damn wrong about saying Brooks starting Sefolosha would be a big mistake. That worked out great for them tonight.
(Although I hope he keeps it up. I'd like to see Sefolosha attempt to do that more often.)
Huh? rascal now just making things up.
BTW, I was just kidding about the "*snip*" aimed at you. Your post didn't even qualify as someone saying the Spurs haven't been tested after this game.
Tbh, 2012 has been the best year of rascal posting ever. You've brought your A game. Props.![]()
But yeah, rascal getting on another poster for supposedly doubting the Spurs is the goods.
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=190590
Some good reading about rascal, one of my favourite posters tbh.
Rascal trolling himself....
![]()
Testing ... testing . . .
O. K. C???
Well get ready for Kerr to repeat it a few more times.
Lies if you say every ing series since 2004. I just said they would sweep the last series and i am predicting the Spurs to win this one.
You don't make any predictions yet rag on me about mine .
Grow some balls and make some predictions instead of just trolling in here and jumping on peoples backs. I have seen in other threads how other posters say you have nothing to add so just get out of the thread if you are only in to attack people.
You have had a stalking interest in me since 2004. I must have pulled your chain so hard you have never forgotten.
Never heard of tucks. You must be a user.
I remember you were on the BAMA wagon way back in the early days.![]()
I wanted to hit on my prediction, the Thunder winning game 1.
What good is a prediction if you don't want it to happen?
You predicted they would lose against the ing Supersonics in 2005!!!!!! That is how much faith you have on this team.
I don't attack people, I attack certain posters who I feel are idiots. And of course, the fact that you hate on Manu every chance you have does note bode well with me.
One thing about me is I don't make things up. I don't have a good enough imagination to make things up.
Timvp: You are not as bad as you were in the past about admitting to being wrong. I will admit to that.
Cheryl Miller's clit is bigger than Reggie's full erection
Why hold on to a prediction some poster made on a public forum from 2005 if you don't have some type of obsession with that poster?![]()
My obsession is with idiots: yourself and ducks stand on the frontline of idiocy . . .
takes 6 days of rest and did not play thunder all year for manu to actually have his best game this year
only because he got sick of hearing how great harden was
Media Logic: If a team passes a test easily, it's not a test. Winning by 10 is not a test, even if you once trailed by 24.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)