Reply With Quote
No, I understood that.
I also think that if that were the chosen course of action (declining comment), you would have manufactured a reason to criticise it.
But that is simply what I think. Don't ask me for evidence of it.
No, I understood that.
I also think that if that were the chosen course of action (declining comment), you would have manufactured a reason to criticise it.
But that is simply what I think. Don't ask me for evidence of it.
No, I understood that.
I also think that if that were the chosen course of action (declining comment), you would have manufactured a reason to criticise it.
But that is simply what I think. Don't ask me for evidence of it.
I know that people often don't take me serious. I just wonder if he knows he is in the same boat? He seems to get real pissy over it...
I am done being a , as I have gotten it out of my system for the most part.
You can take me as seriously as you want. This is the internet, after all. SA210 doesn't seem to take me seriously, and comes off as a clown, because I have a tendency to ask rather pertinant questions that don't tend to get answers.
I will put the same question to you:
If someone avoids answering fair questions with direct answers does that indicate they are being honest with you?
LOL
I answered your question. I seriously doubt he is getting daily briefings from the FBI team in Libya when he doesn't even bother to get his daily national security briefings half the time. Oh thats right. He's so ing smart he doesn't need to meet with his national security advisors.
You have my word I had at least one rather concrete example in mind when I wrote that.
HOnestly, now that I have a new conceptial framework with with to view some of the conservative comments here, I am pretty sure others will pop up.
But, for now, I have to get going.
It doesn't indicate anything at all by itself. Too many possibilities including they may have the right response, but not be ready to back it up. Maybe they just want to with you. You after all, get you panties in a bunch so easily.
Why do you ask for the banning of Cosmoron rather than just use the IGNORE option?
Do you not have free will?
If I were devious, I would exploit your short temper so often.
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 09-20-2012 at 04:07 PM.
If someone avoids answering fair questions with [direct] answers does that indicate they are being honest with you?
Again, that isn't what I just asked.
I want to know, if you think that "If someone avoids answering fair questions with [direct] answers does that indicate they are being honest with you? "
It seems to me that the common sense answer is yes, but I wanted to see if you agreed with that statement. (i.e. If a person cannot answer questions directly, does that mean they are being evasive and/or dishonest?)
You might try, but you aren't intelligent enough to pull it off. No offense.
Since you set out with intent, stalking and logging other users activities, maybe we like ing with you back?
I see nothing wrong with acknowledging the question was asked and replying that they aren't prepared to answer the question until they get more information.
That's not a lie.
Making up some bull story that they had no evidence that it wasn't just random spin off violence from protests about some stupid movie and LYING that they didn't have contradicting evidence is just that..a LIE.
No, you entirely meant that offensive. That's OK though.
Trust me. I'm a doctor.
RandomChumpDumper...
I asked you a direct question!
Why do you ask for the banning of Cosmoron rather than just use the IGNORE option?
Why do you not answer?
So did they stick the moviemaker in Gitmo?
I'm sorry guys. Looks like I made Random cry, and he stormed off to his room.
I thought he had at least two bodyguards with him? (The former seals)... not sure if that counts as a "detail" or not.
Hoist the Flag, Praise the Lord, Pass the Ammo: US Foreign Policy
The Saturday headline in the Wall Street Journal was: “Anti-U.S. Mobs on Rampage.”
The next day, a NATO airstrike killed eight women collecting firewood in the mountains of eastern Afghanistan, an event that garnered virtually zero mainstream U.S. headlines.
Somewhere in the gap between these two phenomena — the overheated news about our violent, irrational enemies in the Middle East and the silence surrounding our war and occupation of the region — lies American politics, values, the presidential race, the national iden y. Beyond that gap lies the truth about who we are, and only when we have access to it does the future turn into creative possibility and peace become possible.
http://truth-out.org/buzzflash/comme...foreign-policy
"Why Do They Hate Us?"
Nope. The State Department admitted yesterday that Stevens had no security detail when he was attacked and the SEALs killed just jumped in to help.
partial quote:
http://www.washingtonguardian.com/revising-libya-storyThe two former Navy SEALs killed in last week's attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi were not part of Ambassador Chris Stevens' official security detail but took up arms in an effort to protect the facility when it was overrun by insurgents, U.S. officials tell the Washington Guardian.
The two former SEALS, Tyrone Woods, 41, and Glen Doherty, 42, were not employed by the State Department diplomatic security office and instead were what is known as personal service contractors who had other duties related to security, the officials said.
They stepped into action, however, when Stevens became separated from the small security detail normally assigned to protect him when he traveled from the more fortified embassy in Tripoli to Benghazi, the officials said.
He's not in the same boat.
Good catch CC. I wonder what happened to that security detail? Hopefully there's some investigation into that.
Only if congress does it. Obama wants the whole thing blamed on that stupid movie and swept under the rug.
In the grand scheme of things we should just move on.
I guess your clairvoyance runs hot and cold:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...0&postcount=20
Just going by what he is saying.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions