Because anyone with a brain knows it wasn't just a "demonstration against the movie" that got out of control.
You are a pretty smart guy. You don't still believe that story, do you?
if Petraeus has already lied to Congress about Benghazi, why would you bleive his retraction?
You seem to assume Petraeus has something to say about Benghazi he hasn't already said. Why?
Because anyone with a brain knows it wasn't just a "demonstration against the movie" that got out of control.
You are a pretty smart guy. You don't still believe that story, do you?
I don't believe reducing what happened to a single talking point gives an accurate picture of what happened, but neither do I think the Obama administration limited itself to it's own initial assessment and talking points. Pretending it did, as you seem to be doing, is very misleading too.
I don't ever remember a concession that it was a successful terrorist attack against our US embassy that was apparently intentionally planned and executed on the anniversary of 9/11.
If you don't think that was what it was, please feel free to elaborate. I know you like to argue with me but insisting otherwise is positively Boutonish.
It wasn't an embassy for one.
And the State Department report says it was a terrorist attack and there were no demonstrations prior to it.
Diplomatic compound. I stand corrected although the ambassador is still dead.
CC still throwing on the wall, hoping it will stick. You need a new hobby horse, CC.
so are about 20 diplomatic staff dead under your loverly Repug administration. where was your fabricated outrage then?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)