See, I don't necessarily disagree with that. It's just that nine out of ten people wanting Manu over Tony doesn't mean that Manu is 'ridiculously' a 'far superior' player. And I think it's simply not the truth anyway. Manu has never been the scorer during the regular season that Tony is. I think it could be argued that Manu is the better player, but it's going to be difficult for you to show that he's undoubtedly far superior and that people choosing Manu over Tony believe that too.
You can't use averages in this case because some players are on rookie contracts. Lebron is on a rookie contract, so the numbers would be skewed if you chose to include him. The rookie salary scale makes such comparisons useless. In addition, just because a player signed a contract doesn't mean that he isn't overpaid. And it doesn't mean that another team would or wouldn't sign him to a larger or smaller dollar amount at any given time. Just because some dumbass paid Allan Houston the max doesn't mean that solid shooting guards in general are going to make a ton of money. Also, some of the contracts we'd be talking about would have been signed five or six or more years ago. The climate was certainly different then.Tell me what the avg top 5 point guards make vs the avg top 5 swing players? If there’s a wide disparity and then I’ll agree with you. I don’t think you will find one.
I'm talking about what's in demand right now.
His ability to make three pointers at the ends of games is a tangible skill. You can put your hands around it. You know it's going to happen. You can develop tangible stats to support it. It's do ented and concrete.Look at your sentence three pointers at the END OF GAMES. What is it in Robert Horry that allows him to do that better than anyone else? There is an intangible quality about him.
I just don't understand why it would be any different for role players. Superstars may have bigger egos, but I think that many role players have the same affliction.The water is muddier when talking about role players. But I’m open minded enough to consider you might be right.
There is certainly economic value, but I'm questioning you about why you think that the Spurs being in town makes a real significant difference when businesses are thinking about coming to town. There are other economic benefits to be sure. Then again, other small markets have lost professional sporting teams without taking huge economic hits.Never said that was their only value, but one part. City did pay $500 million to keep their team, so there must be some economic value. Imagine if the team actually left, I bet the city would ante up a billion dollars to get them back.
And I'll do the same. Good talk.Not going to fight with you because you made an attempt to address each point.

Reply With Quote
, the jealousy and hatred is spreading!
