Reply With Quote
wHY DO YOU THINK ANYONE CARES WHAT YOU THINK?
wc
wHY DO YOU THINK ANYONE CARES WHAT YOU THINK?
1) You're shouting.
2) lol
LOL...
Sorry, my caps lock was on. I often am mul asking an check Spurstalk every few minutes as i am doing somethingm else. I use the caps lock for something else at times. Usually I fix the problem, but i had a " it" moment and didn't care.
REAL libertarians believe every conspiracy theory ever and watch hour-long YouTube videos all day
Not really, but ur still a fake lib
The coming drone attack on America
In February of this year, Congress passed the FAA Reauthorization Act, with its provision to deploy fleets of drones domestically. Jennifer Lynch, an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, notes that this followed a major lobbying effort, "a huge push by […] the defense sector" to promote the use of drones in American skies: 30,000 of them are expected to be in use by 2020,
Business-friendly media stress their planned abundant use by corporations: police in Seattle have already deployed them.
An unclassified US air force do ent reported by CBS (pdf) news expands on this unprecedented and uncons utional step – one that formally brings the military into the role of controlling domestic populations on US soil, which is the bright line that separates a democracy from a military oligarchy.
The air force do ent explains that the air force will be overseeing the deployment of its own military surveillance drones within the borders of the US; that it may keep video and other data it collects with these drones for 90 days without a warrant – and will then, retroactively, determine if the material can be retained – which does away for good with the fourth amendment in these cases.
the wording allows for domestic military surveillance of non-"specifically identified" people (that is, a group of activists or protesters) and it comes with the important caveat, also seemingly wholly uncons utional, that it may not target individuals "unless expressly approved by the secretary of Defense".
"Distribution of domestic imagery" can go to various other government agencies without your consent, and that imagery can, in that case, be distributed to various government agencies; it may also include your most private moments and most personal activities. The authorized "collected information may incidentally include US persons or private property without consent". Jennifer Lynch of the Electronic Frontier Foundation told CBS:
"In some records that were released by the air force recently … under their rules, they are allowed to fly drones in public areas and record information on domestic situations."
local cops in Grand Forks, North Dakota called in a DHS Predator drone – the same make that has caused hundreds of civilian casualties in Pakistan – over a dispute involving a herd of cattle. The military rollout in process and planned, within the US, is massive: the Christian Science Monitor reports that a total of 110 military sites for drone activity are either built or will be built, in 39 states. That covers America.
"At the same time, it is inevitable that we will see [increased] pressure to allow weaponized drones. The way that it will unfold is probably this: somebody will want to put a relatively 'soft' nonlethal weapon on a drone for crowd control. And then things will ratchet up from there."
"Our biggest concerns about the deployment of drones domestically is that they will be used to create pervasive surveillance networks. The danger would be that an ordinary individual once they step out of their house will be monitored by a drone everywhere they walk or drive. They may not be aware of it. They might monitored or tracked by some silent invisible drone everywhere they walk or drive."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...attack-america
I think the term libertarian gets hijacked by neo-cons sometimes. Gary Johnson is a libertarian. Glenn Beck is not a libertarian. I don't give a if Beck says he is a libertarian. He's not one. If you are going to call yourself a libertarian, your views and opinions should at least somewhat be similar to those of libertarianism. Being fiscally responsible and socially liberal seem like a good way of thinking in my opinion.
No, he just runs as one.... Handing out film subsidies as governor, wanting to "micromanage" the Fed instead of ending it, supporting the death penalty, etc. precludes him from actually being a libertarian, tbh....
You are not a libertarian asshole. Anybody that believes animals can be eaten without their consent but wants to put people in jail for giving them pleasure is not a real libertarian.
What's your point. They are still gonna take your guns away. Because 20 AMERICAN elementary school kids were killed by a semi auto weapon. Nothing you say will keep anti gun people or those parents from forgetting that.
I doubt any guns will be taken away. Lots of kids have been killed in school before.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
