Anti-gun senator shoots intruder

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

The best vid online tbh. Maher is a genius a visionaire...

Maher is the best political mind on TV.

[LnGrrrR]

Tbh, making fun of ignorant Mississipians is like shooting fish in a barrel.

[DMC]

[DMC]

Maher is the best political mind on TV.

I disagree. He's intentionally obtuse when it comes to anything that goes against the far left. He's dishonest and relies on shock journalism. I'd take Jon Stewart 10 to 1 over Maher.

[Wild Cobra]

Tbh, making fun of ignorant Mississipians is like shooting fish in a barrel.

Still, I wonder how many people they interviewed before choosing the clips they did.

[Latarian Milton]

I'd sell every gun I own for just 2x what I paid. I'm pretty sure you couldn't afford any of them and I'm not sure you're legally allowed to own one.

Your other senseless yapping is pointless, since the conversation is about Australia.

a strict gun control may not have any significant effect on gun crimes overall but it'll certainly lower the rate of mass shooting since most criminals of such cases got their guns from legal resources like the one who killed 26 innocent people at sandy hook.

[DMC]

a strict gun control may not have any significant effect on gun crimes overall but it'll certainly lower the rate of mass shooting since most criminals of such cases got their guns from legal resources like the one who killed 26 innocent people at sandy hook.

Those guns were illegal to use since they were stolen. Is stealing guns "getting them from legal resources"?

[Latarian Milton]

Those guns were illegal to use since they were stolen. Is stealing guns "getting them from legal resources"?

but the gun used by adam at sandy hook was not bought from a black market and that's what i mean by legal resource tbh, your once again trying to divert the discussion into a wrong direction but im not gonna buy your trick. if the legal owner of the gun had fulfilled her responsibility of taking care of the gun n keeping it out of the reach of her son who was known to have mental disorders, the tragedy at sandy hook would probably have never happened in the first place. a strick gun control will make gun owners more responsible for the firearms they possess imho

[DMC]

but the gun used by adam at sandy hook was not bought from a black market and that's what i mean by legal resource tbh, your once again trying to divert the discussion into a wrong direction but im not gonna buy your trick. if the legal owner of the gun had fulfilled her responsibility of taking care of the gun n keeping it out of the reach of her son who was known to have mental disorders, the tragedy at sandy hook would probably have never happened in the first place. a strick gun control will make gun owners more responsible for the firearms they possess imho

Even when the black market acquires them, originally they came from legal manufacturers.

[Latarian Milton]

Even when the black market acquires them, originally they came from legal manufacturers.

the discussion hasn't been derailed enough so you're pushing it one step further, ok. even if they were not legally manufactured, the iron ore that they're made from have no sin

[DMC]

the discussion hasn't been derailed enough so you're pushing it one step further, ok. even if they were not legally manufactured, the iron ore that they're made from have no sin

The weapon itself is never illegal. It's possession that's illegal. Once Adam Lanza stole the weapons, he was in illegal possession.

You're trying to draw arbitrary lines to suit your argument. Doing that doesn't lead to anything constructive, though it might make you feel better.

[Latarian Milton]

The weapon itself is never illegal. It's possession that's illegal. Once Adam Lanza stole the weapons, he was in illegal possession.

You're trying to draw arbitrary lines to suit your argument. Doing that doesn't lead to anything constructive, though it might make you feel better.

but it was the legal possessor's duty to keep his/her gun from getting into a er's hands illegally, right? i mean if someone steals your gun and commits a crime with the gun, you should also take responsibility for forefeiting your duty imho. a strict gun law would make gun owners like yourself more responsible for the firearms they own so that it would lower the likelihood of similar tragedies happening, you can't argue against that i guess

[TSA]

Kind of hard to blame the legal owner since she was ing murdered.

[ChumpDumper]

Kind of hard to blame the legal owner since she was ing murdered.

If one takes that tack, she can be blamed for that too.

[TSA]

2/10.

[ChumpDumper]

Well, the argument might be this -- if she was going to put the crazy kid away for being volatile, it may have been a good idea to keep the guns out of the house until he was out of the house.

[Bill_Brasky]

Kind of hard to blame the legal owner since she was ing murdered.

Yeah, with a legal gun that she was careless with and let fall into the hands of her psychotic son. Real responsible.

[Wild Cobra]

I still want to see evidence that this senator is anti-gun.

Anyone...

[FuzzyLumpkins]

The weapon itself is never illegal. It's possession that's illegal. Once Adam Lanza stole the weapons, he was in illegal possession.

You're trying to draw arbitrary lines to suit your argument. Doing that doesn't lead to anything constructive, though it might make you feel better.

Let's obfuscate the conversation by splitting hairs regarding the word 'illegal' and then accuse someone else of drawing arbitrary lines.

Jeez, is there any argument that you do not degrade down into semantics?