Not entirely. The short relative changes are relevant. It's just instrument drift exceeds the desired data, so it's impossible to make proper conclusions of trends.
My God you are stupid.
In past psts, I said the IPCC assessment was incorrect, and even misleading.
They stated "direct solar forcing" and never included "indirect solar forcing." I agree with the assessment for direct forcing. They conveniently leave out any mention of indirect forcing cased by solar changes.
I have made that claim several time.
As for this discussion, you are mixing what is said and twisting it.
Not entirely. The short relative changes are relevant. It's just instrument drift exceeds the desired data, so it's impossible to make proper conclusions of trends.
Lol so now the UV spectrum is an indirect property of solar radiation. pole rack yourself.
I didn't say that either dip .
My God... You are so ing stupid.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)