Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 59 of 59
  1. #51
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Why? Do you mean he's tanking vs LAL's rivals to get into the playoffs? If so, then he should be tanking vs GSW, HOU and especially UTA.
    There's no other explanation for those ed up lineups, tbh. Pop had Green, Splitter, Ginobili, Leonard and Jack, then subbed in and had a lineup of Joseph, De Colo, Neal, Bonner and Mills. What. The. . The game was close and then Pop went full re on the subs utions. Either he's a ing moron, or he's a great coach who has a plan. Pick one.

  2. #52
    Veteran Sean Cagney's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    13,402
    True, but not by 30 points on their home floor, while giving up 130+.
    Yeah, thats is embarassing, seriously.

  3. #53
    MVParker racm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    6,787
    The way some of you complain you'd probably rather have a guy with no Xs and Os knowledge coaching this team like Scott Brooks.

    Then again he wouldn't go mad scientist on the rotations and play Parker 38 mpg and Duncan 34 mpg, tbh.

  4. #54
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    101,216
    "His ugly jumper" ?

    timvp, a couple years ago, you were praising his shooting form

  5. #55
    Veteran spurs10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    10,797
    There's no other explanation for those ed up lineups, tbh. Pop had Green, Splitter, Ginobili, Leonard and Jack, then subbed in and had a lineup of Joseph, De Colo, Neal, Bonner and Mills. What. The. . The game was close and then Pop went full re on the subs utions. Either he's a ing moron, or he's a great coach who has a plan. Pick one.
    This is what I've been wondering. Sure he gave up with the 4 pgs and Bonner, but the game wasn't going to be an historical ass kicking with the previous line-up. Pop knew damn well it was going to get much uglier and figured he'd at least have something motivational to get out of it.

  6. #56
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    The way some of you complain you'd probably rather have a guy with no Xs and Os knowledge coaching this team like Scott Brooks.

    Then again he wouldn't go mad scientist on the rotations and play Parker 38 mpg and Duncan 34 mpg, tbh.
    You've got to wonder what would happen if Pop didn't go mad scientist and just played regular rotations.

  7. #57
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    pop probably doesn't want another ridiculous winning streak going into the playoffs. he'll probably play tim/tiago more minutes together as the season nears the end, considering that's our best big combo. if he doesn't, and he elects to play bonner or blair in the playoffs.. may god have mercy on our souls.
    I don't agree with intentionally losing games but I do think it is crucial to be able to respond well to losses.

  8. #58
    MVParker racm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    6,787
    You've got to wonder what would happen if Pop didn't go mad scientist and just played regular rotations.
    The Spurs fivepeat from 2003-2007 guaransheed

    That said the Blazers love running up the score, I was actually gunning for the Knicks to blow them out last season.

  9. #59
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    The Spurs fivepeat from 2003-2007 guaransheed

    That said the Blazers love running up the score, I was actually gunning for the Knicks to blow them out last season.
    The Blazers love running up the score on the one team that won't give them a flagrant-two for doing it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •