Dan...
It's still only about a 12% net change, so saying a group caused 20% is ridiculous.
I do find it highly coincidental that unemployment was going down, until democrats won the majority in 2006...
When you account for the U6 rate, the underemployed and part-time employed numbers, you get an unemployment rate of 15% peaking at just under 20% after the Bush recession
Note that some of these part-time workers counted as employed by U-3 could be working as little as an hour a week. And the "marginally attached workers" include those who have gotten discouraged and stopped looking, but still want to work. The age considered for this calculation is 16 years and over
Last edited by Nbadan; 03-19-2013 at 10:17 PM.
Dan...
It's still only about a 12% net change, so saying a group caused 20% is ridiculous.
I do find it highly coincidental that unemployment was going down, until democrats won the majority in 2006...
I never claimed it to be 20%, that's ludicrous, I said 20 million people lost jobs during the Bush Recession..It's still only about a 12% net change, so saying a group caused 20% is ridiculous.
OK, I stand corrected on that. Still, doesn't U6 cover more than just unemployed who want jobs?
The U6 covers the underemployed and part-time workers who want a full time job but don't..it's the figure regularly thrown around by conservative commentators...as I posted before, some of these workers could be working as few as one hour and be considered employed by the U3.....Still, doesn't U6 cover more than just unemployed who want jobs?
Good.
I see you now acknowledge your comment, "20 million people lost their jobs," as a lie or deception.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)