If we nuke North Korea, China and every Muslim country as you have proposed in the last few months, we may make ourselves extinct yet.To not react that way and defend ourselves...even if it means their extinction...would mean our culture has failed and we deserve to be extinct. That's not going to happen Manny.
But Whottt, seriously. I see you working and I understand. I mean, whats not to understand? We nuke people that aren't responsible for the act that we are retaliating for, and the people who's ideology we piss on will surely fall in line.
You can't reason with them, so nuke them into submission!
Right ing on!
America, YEAH!
There was once a mustache having man that wanted to make a whole group of people extinct. Whottt must hold him and his ideals in high regard.
No...you just don't get the difference...Adapt to the modern world or we will nuke you!
You make the point that people like you are no better than the terrorists so much better than I ever could.
You think an attack on the World Trade Center is equal to a civillian death in an attempt to take out a military target...
You think deliberately targeting children is equal to civillians being killed because soldiers are hiding behind them...
You just don't get the differences...but they are there.
But honestly...if nukes start flying?
America my home Yeah. I'll feel guilty about it...but I'll get over it.
I don't want to make them extinct...I just find that a better choice than getting nuked. If that's the choice it's an easy one to make for me...
No, I asked you.
Was it all going to the US before the invasion?
Yes or no?
But how exactly does that deter another attack from terrorists who aren't anywhere near Mecca?
And what do you do when that doesn't work?
Hard act to follow.
Really? When did I make that equation? LINK?
LINK?You think deliberately targeting children is equal to civillians being killed because soldiers are hiding behind them...
And I'm sure the rest of the Muslims would feel the same way. Once again, your logic is ed.You just don't get the differences...but they are there.
But honestly...if nukes start flying?
America my home Yeah. I'll feel guilty about it...but I'll get over it.
Drop some porn on them... and some Jonathon Hair Products for the ladies hahahahahaha
Right right. But you said in retaliation, buddy. So how exactly is a retaliation nuking of Mecca going to prevent further nukes form going off in the US?
It's not like Japan where they had command and control to surrender.
What is Saudi going to do Surrender? then what?... they just a bunch of royals sitting around doing coke on private 747's they don't give a .
If a nuclear weapon is discharged in a major US city, all bets are off. The rules of engagement will change in a heartbeat.
I think it could possibly be a scenario for widescale nuclear deployment, depending on what happens in the aftermath. You have to realize that if something of that nature occurred, what is completely unreasonable and unforgivable today becomes an appropriate response tomorrow.
WHY?
If you get attacked, shouldn't you attack those who attacked you?
We have plenty of non nuke toys still not used. MOAB's, diasy cutters. B52's on Diego that can carpet bomb with GPS now. Plenty of artillery...
You can't use a nuke without some plan or reason. In WWII they where able to give the president a good plan to help end the war and fighting quickly. There is no way 2 well placed nukes would end the war with Radical Islam.
Radical Islam is EVERYWHERE... Rising sun was limited to a theater and water locked (after there navy was destroyed). Islam is like herpes it's spreads fast. They are working the hardest in South America right now.
My governments job is not to extract revenge, it is to make sure I am safe. If you can give me a scenario where nuking someone else after a terrorist nuclear device goes off here helps me become safer, I'll listen to it.
Feel free to come forth with your scenairos.
Setting off a nuclear device anywhere in the Mid East gets us nowhere but backwards. It increases the hatred on the West and gives Muslim extremists all the tools they need for recruitment.
In fact, if we were to do anything like nuke Mecca, the people would go to the extremists in DROVES.
Hey...I said give them warning. And no...I don't mean some kind of vague threat...
This gets the dumbasses there to get nuked and the ones that don't can live on.
Japan. And it's what they are going to try to do to us...You can't reason with them, so nuke them into submission!
Right ing on!
America, YEAH!
Allah, YEAH
Who said anything about North Korea?
North Korea is an atheist country, and so is China...they won't care if we nuke Mecca.
China's got muslim problems too...pretty much any place that has muslims...has muslim problems... heads wanting Islamic states and killing children when they don't get it... like that.
Ohhhhhhhhhh, give them a warning. So the terrorists could actually LEAVE and we'd accomplish even less.
How exactly does this prevent future attacks and make us safer?
If you dont' think the use of nuclear weapons by the United States for a third time woudln't begin a world wide arms race you are an absolute idiot. Well, you are an absolute idiot.
If the United States uses nuclear weapons countries around the world - including some of our "allies" - will believe (and perhaps rightfully so) that the only way to protect themselves from the United States would be to have more nuclear weapons. It'd be the Cold War on a whole new global level.
Um...when did the Jews go around blowing up buildings and trying to nuke German cities prior to WWII?
Again...your failure to see the difference doesn't mean there isn't one.
When do the majority of Muslims go around blowing up buildings? How many terrorits are there in Mecca (or better yet how many will be there after you warn them and they leave?)?
Do you actually think that you can destroy a movement by destroying a religous city? Are you that ing stupid? I've seen you argue idiocy before, but this takes the ing cake.
The next post you respond with an answer explaining how nuking Mecca would make us safer will be the first one. Keep ignoring the most pertinent question of the thread, however.
good one.Ohhhhhhhhhh, give them a warning. So the terrorists could actually LEAVE and we'd accomplish even less.
And what makes you think it's going to "all" be going to the US after the Invasion?
What makes you think any of it is?
America gets more Oil from the rest of the World than they do from the MidEast.
And what makes you think it's going to be discounted? Oil is a globally traded commodity...it's not going to be any cheaper for us than it is anyone else(unlike the Oil in the OFF program)...and Oil prices are determined by a lot of factors other than availability of Oil.
...Every conservative and non dumbass in the world is going to be pissed at me for giving away the joke now....
Sorry guys.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
