Reply With Quote
i believe that dust doesn't evaporate upward and if a building falls the dust should rise no higher than the height of the building that fell
You didn't answer the question.
Do you believe Judy Wood's directed energy beams from space theory?
Yes or no.
i believe that dust doesn't evaporate upward and if a building falls the dust should rise no higher than the height of the building that fell
Again, you didn't answer the question.
Do you believe Judy Wood's directed energy beams from space theory?
Yes or no.
i believe that the surrounding buildings would have gotten pelted with debris and damaged
They were.
Still, you didn't answer the question.
Do you believe Judy Wood's directed energy beams from space theory?
Yes or no.
i believe that chunks of building don't just randomly turn into dust and disintegrate in midair as they tumble toward the ground
Those didn't.
You didn't answer the question.
Do you believe Judy Wood's directed energy beams from space theory?
Yes or no.
Getting m>s to answer that question straight is tougher than getting you to admit your sexuality.
At least my question is topical.
Scrotum perched on this thread trying hard to concoct his next pussified deflection
basing your rhetoric and reason to go to war in 7 countries on a mistranslation
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...jun/14/post155
My recent comment piece explaining how Iran's president was badly misquoted when he allegedly called for Israel to be "wiped off the map" has caused a welcome little storm. The phrase has been seized on by western and Israeli hawks to re-double su ions of the Iranian government's intentions, so it is important to get the truth of what he really said.
A very last point. The fact that he compared his desired option - the elimination of "the regime occupying Jerusalem" - with the fall of the Shah's regime in Iran makes it crystal clear that he is talking about regime change, not the end of Israel. As a schoolboy opponent of the Shah in the 1970's he surely did not favour Iran's removal from the page of time. He just wanted the Shah out.
The same with regard to Israel. The Iranian president is undeniably an opponent of Zionism or, if you prefer the phrase, the Zionist regime. But so are substantial numbers of Israeli citizens, Jews as well as Arabs. The anti-Zionist and non-Zionist traditions in Israel are not insignificant. So we should not demonise Ahmadinejad on those grounds alone.
He should probably just say he would prefer some other party/coalition be elected.
Might help.
this statement is understandable from a person who has no knowledge of a language that has been spoken since 500BC
Ahmadinejad should have just said "Hope and Change. Yes we can" like Obama did and case solved
Are you saying it is impossible to say he would prefer some other party/coalition be elected?
Yes or no.
Still working on your translation?
Having trouble finding your Farsi-to-Chicken dictionary?
butthurt
and to answer your question. nothing is impossible.
Thanks for admitting you're wrong.
I didn't. just because something is possible does not mean it's the only possibility
No one said there was only one possibility.
You aren't very smart, are you?
exactly. So if I never claimed there was only 1 possibility, how can you possibly have proven me wrong?
I'm sorry you are not having a good day
Then what are you saying here?Explain yourself, in English.
it means that you don't know about the language, thus have no idea of how easy it is to mistranslate something.
sorry to hurt your feelings
I have no doubt it was mistranslated, so you're wrong.
How many years have you studied Farsi?
sorry but this statement just shows your ignorance not only on Farsi, but on languages in general. Let me guess, you speak only 1 language?
again, not to hurt your feelings but learning that statements in ancient languages can easily be taken out of context
Might help.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
