Reply With Quote
except that CUSA is not an AQ conference while the Big XII is.
daily dose of smh utsa
Bunch of small minded re s in here. When you have a chance to move up to a better conference you take it, especially when youre in rich recruiting grounds.
Ill use Baylor as an example again. Would you rather have gone through the ass kickings they went through to get to where theyre at or have a few Top 10-15 seasons like Houston did in C-USA and be where theyre at? A&M will be fine especially once the playoff system starts.
except that CUSA is not an AQ conference while the Big XII is.
daily dose of smh utsa
And A&M has never been and never will be the doormat Baylor was. That wasnt the point, but not surprised you missed it or purposely looked past it.
smh TT
You specifically made the point that if you have the chance to move to a better conference, you take it and implied the SEC is better than the Big XII.
You're an ignorant fool talking out of his ass.
Morning cup of smh utsa re .
Oh so what youre trying to say is that since theyre both AQ the SEC is no better than the Big 12? Youre dumber than I give you credit for tbh.
smh lmao TT
That's exactly what I'm saying. Only small minded re s fall for the current hype.
smh utsa re
Yeah, and the East was no weaker than the West during most of the 2000s because theyre both in the NBA right?
smh smh lmao smh TT
That makes no sense.
Yeah, and the East was no weaker than the West during most of the 2000s because theyre both in the NBA right?
smh smh lmao smh TT
Stay re ed utsa re
So you think SEC = B12 ??? Is that what you are trying to spew out of your pie hole? I sure hope the not. Otherwise there will be a ton of people
I will go on record right now that Ole piss would wipe the floor with TT.
TT will lose to a ty UT team as well.
I know they can all beat Utsa, but Im ing realistic...... unlike TT homers.
It makes perfect sense, Mr. Big 12=SEC.
smh lmao TT
I'm saying it's no better being a member of the SEC than being a member of the Big 12.
But you in your re edness forgot your original point in just a matter of a few posts.
smh re ed utsa freaks
Sure it is. Theyre only equal in the sense that theyre both AQ.
Being in the SEC is WAAAAAY better than being in the Big 12. Its the best conference period. It doesnt have a dominating bully school that hogs all the money, yet can only win a championship every blue moon. At least in the SEC, the money is shared and they have multiple teams that win it all.
So come again??? How is being in the B12 as good as being in the SEC? Please splain
Great. Provide reasons that UT should move to the SEC right now if they receive an invite.
Go.
They shouldnt dumbass. They keep all the money where they are. You think they want to share???? Beside, too many team in the SEC would beat the out of UT.
Google can help you find how big 12 money is shared and how much each school got.
smh utsa research dept.
I'm saying it's no better being a member of the SEC than being a member of the Big 12.This would represent at least a 50% increase in the SEC's per-school take, which could be $34 million in 2014-15 and for a few years exceed the revenue each of the Big Ten Conference schools get from their shares of conference and NCAA revenues. In part because of the Big Ten Network's success, most Big Ten schools recently have been receiving $1 million to $4 million more per year than SEC schools – roughly $23 million to $25 million apiece.However, because of a pending re-configuration of the SEC's television arrangements and a major increase in postseason football payouts that will occur when the Bowl Championship Series is replaced by a four-team playoff in the 2014-15 season, SEC revenue is about to escalate dramatically.
Yeah, lets use UT because everyone in the Big 12 has the national appeal they do.
Playing in the best conference alone should be enough of a reason. But for small minded re s like you, I guess not.
"At least big daddeh UT gets to pull in SEC type money" -tech
Of course they shouldn't, dumb . That's why I'm asking your fellow to back up his premise that schools should move to a better conference if given the chance.
Let's use UT because you left yourself open to use UT.
it was barely five years ago that the big 12 was the best conference.Playing in the best conference alone should be enough of a reason. But for small minded re s like you, I guess not.
utsa thinking small.
Ok, cool. Doesnt change the fact that its extremely re ed to use them.
Subjective. But regardless it sure as aint the best now, nor does it look like it can be anytime soon.it was barely five years ago that the big 12 was the best conference.
utsa thinking small.
"at least our new daddeh Bama respect us while he us" - ag
They get payed the same amount of $ as everyone else in the conference
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
