rofl. your one to talk.
Spelling aside, how can you even make this claim?
I posted several quotes, all cited and do ented.
All you did was contradict yourself over and over.
You whined about the Arabs who perpetrated 9/11, then you ed up by conflating them with Afghan fighters, now you are doubling down by basically saying all Muslims are al Qaeda.
Good show.
this is bull . If you are waiting in a gettaway car and your parder kills a bank clerk, you are acussed of murder too. wake up
very simple. CIA by helping Bin Laden and Al Qaeda has their hands dirty with american blood. clear as waterYou think this describes the US role in 9/11?
If so please describe the US role in 9/11.
so you believe Bin Laden over the MI6 Chief
clearly to a person with more than a handful of neurons, Hilary is talking about Al Qaeda. "we helped and trained those guys that attacked us" -Hilary
The Talibal didn't attack the US.Al Qaeda did.
Clearly HIlary was talking about the organization that attacked us. Unfortunately it seems you have less neurons than previously thought
Last edited by cheguevara; 09-18-2013 at 03:24 AM.
Since Cook's line makes no practical sense and he was butthurt about losing his job, yes. You're saying the US was attacked by a database. I disagree.so you believe Bin Laden over the MI6 Chief
There is no such quote from Hilary in that video. Unfortunately it seems you lie even more than previously thought.clearly to a person with more than a handful of neurons, Hilary is talking about Al Qaeda. "we helped and trained those guys that attacked us" -Hilary
The Talibal didn't attack the US.
Clearly HIlary was talking about the organization that attacked us. Unfortunately it seems you have less neurons than previously thought
And I thought you lied quite a bit tbh.
You need to look up the definition. You are charged as an accomplice to the crime in your own situation. You knew what was going down and aided in the crime. Are you from a different country and dont understand our laws and words?
So is the US government complicit in the attacks on 9/11? Did we knowingly aid in the terrorist acts committed on 9/11? We knew what was going down and aided in the endeavor? It's not that difficult a question...
Making words and sentences clear to you is very difficult. Water is apparently not transparent to you. Even extraordinarily shallow water. One would think you are trying to see the bottom of the Mariana Trench; its not that deep...
contradict myself?I posted videos and articles, my goodness your like Fox News reporter. Arabs or Afghans, the war was never against a race, even you should be smart enough to know that. The Mujahideen that were fighting in Afghanistan at the times were known as "Arab Afghans". Explain to me how im contradicting myself Bill.
agreed, we should all trust lefty when comes to terrorism tbh
You conflated the "Arab Afghans" with the Afghan Afghans.contradict myself?
They are separate groups.
The Afghans were from Afghanistan.
The Arabs were not.
The CIA funded the Afghans through the Pakistani ISI.
The Arabs funded themselves.
Do you finally understand this?
Yes or no.
Jews must really really hate the Assads (of course his proteges Hizbollah)
Israel Sides with Syrian Jihadists
http://consortiumnews.com/2013/09/18...ian-jihadists/
The arabs funded them selves? If people are giving their lives for a cause, odds are they are not wealthy. Someone higher up was funding them, you need to dig a little deeper my friend.
Bin Laden was already a multimillionaire. He funded himself. He and other Arabs he solicited funded the Arabs and other foreigners.
Do you finally understand?
Yes or no.
o dear, bin laden was a frequent visitor of the US, his family is the next most powerful family behind the "royal" family. His father has built a long standing relationship with the royal family, and the royal family has a great relationship with at the time the Bush Administration.. connect the dots chump.
No.
Say what you mean.
Don't be a coward.
well the point is CIA and US government hands are dirty with american blood. Whether you like it or not.
Fine, I will even go ahead and concede that accomplice might be too strong a word. I will go ahead and call the CIA and US government and accessory to 911(at the very least). Most of the world agrees with that statement.
Israel is terrified of the Arab spring. They are letting the Saudis take care of the issue, that is why they have given green light to the jihadist to dispose of Assad. This time there won't be an arab spring per se, in Syria. They are still experimenting but either they will install a puppet government to the Saudi kings, or will keep the situation a complete and utter mess like it is in Libya and Iraq. Democracy my ass
At least Israel is keeping in the sidelines right now and being quiet. Last time warmonger Bibby opened his mouth to the world he became the laughingstock with his ridiculous diagrams of bombs straight out of the Pink Panther to ilustrate the situation
So according to the neocons in Israel, they don't give a if jihadists take over Syria, as long as thei enemy Iran is punished. They don't give a if entire legions of women and children are killed. They just want a strategic advantage.
"Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren said the fall of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad would be a boon to Israel and the Mideast, even if radical Islamists try to fill the vacuum left by his departure.
“There’s the possibility that you’ll have Sunni extremist elements who will try to come to the fore,” Oren said yesterday in Washington. “Our opinion is that any situation would be better than the current situation” in which the Syrian regime has a strategic alliance with Iran and the Lebanese Shiite Muslim terrorist group Hezbollah, he said."
great, you want Assad out, go ahead and take him out Bibby. Why u need US help pussy?
Which countries has Israel designated as a target for total destruction?
And who exactly, has in public, stated that the total destruction of Israel is the goal?
Fathead...
"they don't give a if entire legions of women and children are killed. They just want a strategic advantage. "
well yeah, have you read the talmud? we're just animals to them, "goys" they call us. they're supremacists. america needs to figure out jews are not our friends. i don't hate them but i don't have a weird hard on for them either. my problem is whenever they try to screw whites over...we don't need to fight any more of their battles.
wrong room, the mistranslation room is a couple doors ahead.
Ahmadinejad was quoting the Ayatollah Khomeini in the specific speech under discussion: what he said was that "the occupation regime over Jerusalem should vanish from the page of time." No state action is envisaged in this lament; it denotes a spiritual wish, whereas the erroneous translation – "wipe Israel off the map" – suggests a military threat. There is a huge chasm between the correct and the incorrect translations. The notion that Iran can "wipe out" U.S.-backed, nuclear-armed Israel is ludicrous. - Shiraz Dossa, a professor of Political Science at St. Francis Xavier University in Nova Scotia, Canada
the Jews have their radicals just like the muslims have. Their holy books also state they(jews) are the chosen people to inherit paradise. The rest of the people(non-jews) are pretty much up 's creek. Radicals have a LOT to work with with those "divine" statements.
It denotes a spiritual wish...
I wish we could wipe you off the map, but we really don't want to wipe you of the map, we just wish we could...
Oh yeah...
Che and the Nazi unite into a formidable axis of stupidity.
Who will stop them before they double back on themselves...
do you disagree there are radical Jews in Israel? or which part of my statement hurt your feelings?
let me guess, so now, because I said there are radical Jews out ther, I am an anti-semite
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote