Not quite, pentagram is five points, like a goat head, Star of David is six.
jews are evil tho
"built this team with scouting and development". The Spurs are still built around a former first overall pick the Spurs got by sucking.
even last year, when the Spurs should have won the le, it was because Duncan was their best player in the playoffs and had a resurgence, tbh..
I don't have a problem with tanking or the draft, I don't know why fans and media are so obsessed with this topic, tbh..the current system is fine, there will always be teams tanking, and they should be allowed to choose whatever strategy they want to follow..
Tanking doesn't guarantee a top pick, and having a top pick doesn't guarantee a great player..if teams want to risk their season by tanking, that's cool with me..
The NBA usually has 2-3 contenders per year, a few dark horses, a bunch of playoff fodder followed by the ty teams..it's never going to change, tbh..this league is built around stars + there's the perpetual recycling of ty ex-player coaches kills teams..
I agree completely that we need contraction, but I doubt this would do it. The league won't contract as long as smaller, ty cities like Milwaukee and Minneapolis are willing to subsidize the out of NBA teams by either pouring money into an arena the team owns, or in the event the city owns the arena, giving away a sweetheart lease deal where the city still loses money as the landlord.
Just look at what happens every time New Orleans is about to lose a pro team. Tom Benson bends the city over a table and gets like the $6M "retention fee" the city gives him for keeping the Saints in New Orleans every year. It's a joke to pretend pro-sports teams are totally independent private enterprises.
Good point. Or, teams can actually scout a young player at an early age and take care of him until he is ready to be drafted 15-20 years down the road.
Another update.
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/11...lottery-system
Interesting. I don't feel sorry for the Sixers at all.The NBA is pushing toward changes to the draft lottery system by next season but is facing a strong objection from the Philadelphia 76ers, the franchise that could suffer the most from it, multiple sources told ESPN.com.
Lottery-reform measures were introduced earlier this month at league meetings in Las Vegas, and the NBA Board of Governors could vote changes into place at its preseason meeting in October. Although there are several facets and the proposals haven't been finalized, the goal of commissioner Adam Silver is to balance out the lottery odds so the worst team or teams wouldn't have the highest chances of landing the top pick, sources said.
Currently, the team with the worst record has a 25 percent chance of landing the top pick and the team with the fifth-worst record has an 8.8 percent chance of winning it. In a new format, the bottom five or six teams could have an equal chance.
Grantland's Zach Lowe reported earlier this month on the NBA's proposed changes, which are essentially an attempt to squeeze the lottery odds at either extreme toward a more balanced system in which all 14 teams have a relatively similar chance at the no. 1 pick.
Although the NBA likely would not frame the changes this way, they could be seen as an anti-tanking measure, as teams with the worst records might not earn significantly higher lottery odds.
I agree
But I really felt sorry for the Spurs at the end of the 96-97 season
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)