What the are you talking about? Wade entered the league in 2003, 10 years from 2003 is 2013. If you're born in 2003 you'd become 10 years old in 2013, dumb .
2010 counts you dumb , they gave the award out in February of 2010.
What the are you talking about? Wade entered the league in 2003, 10 years from 2003 is 2013. If you're born in 2003 you'd become 10 years old in 2013, dumb .
Yeah because the decade ended in Dec 31, 2009. You give out the award when the decade is over.
That's not what this thread is about.
Wade's rookie year was 2003-04, which is known was 2004 basketball wise. We don't call this season 2013, that was last season, this season in 2014.
But he got the award in 2010. And he still had a 3 year head star over Wade in that decade.
But I'm not counting THIS SEASON
Well Kobe 5, Duncan 4. So it's not even a debate that Kobe > Duncan, using your logic right?
I know. 2003-04 is known as 2004, not 2003. 2003 was 2002-03.
Anyways, I'm not going to spend time arguing semantics with you, I'm busy watching football.
Pretty much. Duncan shat the bed when he had the chance to tie the ring count.
Wade was kinda awesome vs Portland yesterday
Full highlights:
Wade with 40 pts 4 reb 11 ast 4 stl 4 blk
Kirby 16 pts 2 reb 4 ast 1 stl 4-17 shooting![]()
Kobe 27-4-6 6/10 shooting
Wade 10-1-1 4/10 shooting
Kobe 37-8-6 12/30 shooting
Wade 18-4-5 5/15 shooting
Kobe 33-5-2 10/15 shooting
Wade 19-5-9 7/17 shooting
Kobe 33-3-1 14/23 shooting
Wade 16-4-5 7/17 shooting
took you 2 hours to respond
Like I said, 3 > 2, I don't care about much else.
Deuce Bigalow is re ed as !![]()
OP's takes are usually pretty good but I can't agree that 3 is better than rapist at the moment, notwithstanding the stats. I'm not sure 3 is even better than Manu, all things considered.
You've nary room. Your Neal raped as well.
Tbh I was complimenting rapist tbh old friendAnd tbh, if you agree kobe raped which you seem to (i.e. "your Neal raped as well"), then it shouldn't be an issue when I refer to kobe as rapist regardless of former Spur choo choo, no?
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)