Reply With Quote
Probably wouldn't
Miss him still tbh
he would make us compe ive vs da worriers
Probably wouldn't
Alright you've convinced me. What was I thinking???
Like you said, Bosh just completely blows him out of the water and the two are not even comparable!!!
Forget about the All time great defense we've seen since replacing Splitter with LA, Historical pace for wins and potential for this to be the greatest Spurs team of all time.
Can you imagine if we had somehow gotten Bosh instead?? We'd be so much better off right now....I mean....Just think of addimg that elite RPM and VORP to the nucleus .....man.....just blows LA away. I'm thinking 80 - 2 .
Throw whatever numbers you want out there....if your going to continue down this they are not comparable line you are a moron
The Spurs probably beat GS if they had Bosh over LMA probably Cleveland as well. Again, you keep thinking you're being obviously right, when you just aren't correct. And to think you're wasting your precious posts on such a losing effort. It's shameful. It's even worse because you pretend like numbers don't matter while simultaneously citing other numbers all you want. It totally makes it seem like you don't know what's going on. So you're not even sitting and watching.
Paul Millsap is having a better season than Bosh while playing a similar role.
Millsap is a really good player. He just isn't a center.Paul Millsap is having a better season than Bosh while playing a similar role.
So we know know that they have identical per 36 #'s (other then Aldridge ahead in rebounding ) and that each player has some adv stats in their favour which we both could go on arguing which are more important. We also know that its LA's first year in the system and like all spurs FA's he will become better in the coming seasons. Lastly we see the huge impact LAs improvement on defence had had on the spurs and our historic pace so far this season. Given all of this i can definitely make a case that LA is the better player and without question....at an absolute bare minimum ...That the two are comparable players.
Bosh has had health concerns for awhile now. Just based on each players durability alone some GMs would have picked LA if given the choice last season (and been right) since it seems his career may be over. So if we are to make this comparison now accounting for durability then LA wins in a landslide. If comparing last season then durability still would have been a significant factor to consider.
Pick your battles....Take the L and stop embarrassing yourself.
Its only a message board ......You don't have to get the last word in every time and Its OK to admit a mistake you know?
As i said before...you are truly re ed if you believe that they are on such different levels that a comparison is not justified.
Kawai vs Jefferson.
Lebron vs Matt Barnes
Westbrook vs Beno
Now these are sitaution where they players are not even comparable or "blows them out the water"
Bosh vs LA is not in the same category as the above and are clearly both comparable.
Understand??
Last edited by ceds; 02-26-2016 at 12:48 AM.
Because in your world, assists and steals don't count.
No we can't, because you clearly don't know how any of these stats are weak. They aren't all the same, WS/DRtg/ORtg each have the exact same fatal weakness that prevents them from being useful in a discussion about non-teammates or players who don't play the same position. The adjusted plus-minues don't have that. RAPM's weakness is that it's bayesian, and thusly it's skeptical of improvement or regression. However, that's not an issue when talking about players over their recent careers.that each player has some adv stats in their favour which we both could go on arguing which are more important.
You want to pretend like you're making good points, but you aren't.
You're actually quite a hypocrite. You start off this whole conversation saying you aren't trying to get cred, take jabs and the like, but your rhetoric suggests that's exactly what's important to you. "Take the L"? What kind of novice is that? But overlooking that connotation, what am I supposed to take the L about? I never said the Spurs should go for Bosh rather than LMA, so not that. Bosh is still way ahead of LMA in terms of stats that matter, so I don't have to concede that LMA is as good as Bosh, especially given the issues LMA has had this season. I was in favor of getting Aldridge, so I don't have to take the L on him being good.Pick your battles....Take the L and stop embarrassing yourself.
The only thing I could see is not predicting he'd get another blood clot? See, in your mind, "Bosh has had health concerns for awhile now." Yet that doesn't jive with reality. This has only been an issue for about a year, as the clots were discovered last February. Before that, he had played in 84 percent of his games. And I'm sure he was getting rest games with the Heat while James was there. The clot was considered a freak occurrence. It's not like Gasol's navicular bone, which may well hamper him the rest of his career.
Again, ironic and hypocritical. You're the one who apparently has held onto things I said months ago despite the fact that you rarely post. It's almost creepy.Its only a message board ......You don't have to get the last word in every time and Its OK to admit a mistake you know?
"he'd be a better PG than Porker, tbh"
- lefty
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
