son what 7'6 s have ever dominated the boards? they dont have the lift, speed or second jump capability to get to all those boards. manute per 36 never averaged 10 boards. bradley in his career averaged 9.7 per 36.
He should have averaged 10+ rebounds every season being that size, alot of the time he didn't play aggressive enough. Instead of blocking shots, he'd take charges. He was better on offense but he was more finesse. He should have powered over s. He didn't develop that "Hey , I'm 7'6 and you can't stop me" at ude until his last 2 years. So when people say they were the better combination, what did they accomplish and who was the leader? Just because they were better players doesn't mean they were the better combination. Results are what matters.
son what 7'6 s have ever dominated the boards? they dont have the lift, speed or second jump capability to get to all those boards. manute per 36 never averaged 10 boards. bradley in his career averaged 9.7 per 36.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)