It Pretty Clear By Now That Cosmic Cowboy Has Some Mental Issues Going On

[RandomGuy]

Sorry for late reply I went outside to see if my car alarm went off and come to find out it was just you tooting your horn.

But that is a great list, and since you brought up the moon landings why do you think no country has actually landed a human on the Moon?

the quick answer is, we did land on the moon. You must be a bit baked, not to remember my position on that.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

What I want to know is what is up with south side mexicans and conspiracy theories? It isn't just mouse, it's a culture that eats that right up. they are almost as bad as the white trash is. Head out towards Canyon Lake and you can get mileage out of some of the stupidest . Now that is a culture of stupidity.

[mouse]

the quick answer is, we did land on the moon. You must be a bit baked, not to remember my position on that.

Feel free to post real evidence.

[RandomGuy]

What I want to know is what is up with south side mexicans and conspiracy theories? It isn't just mouse, it's a culture that eats that right up. they are almost as bad as the white trash is. Head out towards Canyon Lake and you can get mileage out of some of the stupidest . Now that is a culture of stupidity.

Well conspiracy theories thrive in scientific ignorance, and low standards of evidence. The more ignorant you are about how things and reality actually works, the more plausible anything sounds.

[RandomGuy]

Feel free to post real evidence.

H. Hiesinger, J. W. Head, U. Wolf, R. Jaumanm, and G. Neukum, H. (2003). "Ages and stratigraphy of mare basalts in Oceanus Procellarum, Mare Numbium, Mare Cognitum, and Mare Insularum". J. Geophys. Res. 108: 5065.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003JGRE..108.5065H

Accurate estimates of mare basalt ages are necessary to place constraints on the duration and the flux of lunar volcanism as well as on the petrogenesis of lunar mare basalts and their relationship to the thermal evolution of the Moon. We performed new crater size-frequency distribution measurements in order to investigate the stratigraphy of mare basalts in Oceanus Procellarum and related regions such as Mare Nubium, Mare Cognitum, and Mare Insularum. We used high-resolution Clementine color data to define 86 spectrally geneous units within these basins, which were then dated with crater counts on Lunar Orbiter IV images. Our crater size-frequency distribution measurements define mineralogical and spectral surface units and offer significant improvements in accuracy over previous analyses. Our data show that volcanism in the investigated region was active over a long period of time from ~3.93 to 1.2 b.y., a total of ~2.7 b.y. Volumetrically, most of the basalts erupted in the Late Imbrian Period between ~3.3 and 3.7 b.y., and we see evidence that numerous units have been resurfaced. During the Eratosthenian Period, significantly less basalt was erupted. Depending on the absolute model ages that one can assign to the lunar chronostratigraphic systems, five units might be of Copernican age. Younger basalts are generally exposed in the center of the investigated area, that is, closer to the volcanic centers of the Aristarchus Plateau and Marius Hills. Older basalts occur preferentially along the northwestern margin of Oceanus Procellarum and in the southeastern regions of the studied area, i.e., in Mare Cognitum and Mare Nubium. Combining the new data with our previously measured ages for basalts in Mare Imbrium, Serenitatis, Tranquillitatis, Humorum, Australe, and Humboldtianum, we find that the period of active volcanism on the Moon lasted ~2.8 b.y., from ~4 b.y. to ~1.2 b.y. On the basis of the basalts dated so far, which do not yet include the potentially young basalts of Mare Smythii [e.g., Schultz and Spudis, 1983], we conclude that Oceanus Procellarum not only exhibits the widest range of ages of all investigated basins but probably also is the location of some of the youngest basalts on the lunar surface...

Or you could try this one:
http://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/lsc/70017.pdf

Start there, and knock yourself out, dude.

Here is a whole list of articles about the scientific papers done on the hundreds of pounds of rocks returned.

http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Archive/Archive-Moon.html

[mouse]

the quick answer is, we did land on the moon. You must be a bit baked, not to remember my position on that.

China? USSR? who are you talking about?

Oh wait! your talking about the "radiation immune" Americans?

And look here Mr smarty guy, even if I was to buy into your Grape kool-aid induced theories that NASA put a human on the moon why haven't they done so since?

[mouse]

Well conspiracy theories thrive in scientific ignorance, and low standards of evidence. The more ignorant you are about how things and reality actually works, the more plausible anything sounds.

Wow look who took over RandomeLie's cubical. the one who can debate w/o acting like a Blake.

To bad by the time I reply small minded RandomLie will be in the telemarketers / Gov Shill cubicle.

[rascal]

You did not...you wrote that yourself

Quit lying. He is not smart enough to think that up.