Reply With Quote
lol lakerfan keeps posting about the Spurs.
4 rings 8 yearsclearly that went over your head, Chump
But still, there's not a sport in the world that would recognize 5 rings in 16 years (if it indeed happens), no repeats, as being better than 5 rings in 11 years, with a 3peat and another repeat. Spurs fans can continue with their small market complex syndrome, doesn't change the fact that the Lakers are the NBA's premier franchise post-Jordan.
lol lakerfan keeps posting about the Spurs.
u know these finals, every spurs win these lakerfan boys are panicking
every loss, they come out of their moms pouch and giving ppl
pretty convincing article
We are comparing franchises now?
But still, there's not a sport in the world that would recognize 5 rings in 16 years (if it indeed happens), no repeats, as being better than 5 rings in 11 years, with a 3peat and another repeat. Spurs fans can continue with their small market complex syndrome, doesn't change the fact that the Lakers are the NBA's premier franchise post-Jordan.
Lakers > spurs for sure. 16 rings, especially this 5 peat Minneapolis rings, were impressive.
Actually, after every Spurs win, they just switch their -talking to LeBron.... they realize Kirby is facing a lose-lose situation here so they'll say anything to downgrade either Duncan or LeBron
It's a biased article no matter how you spin it. He just simply used facts to argue his point. If the same facts were placed on the table, anybody can argue the contrary: Duncan and the Spurs managed to be in the playoffs that many times in the past 2 decades. Everybody remembers when Lakers 3 peat, but people tend to have selective memory when the Lakers had Luke Walton and Smush Parker as starters getting booted in the 1st round by the Suns.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions