The implication was that it should be viewed just as ESPN is.
If you don't consider WND as equal to the Disney media conglomerate as a credible news source, OK.
i didn't equate it, i drew an analogy
The implication was that it should be viewed just as ESPN is.
If you don't consider WND as equal to the Disney media conglomerate as a credible news source, OK.
no, i never implied ESPN and WND should be viewed the same. what you took from my post is your issue, not mine.
you attempted to discredit the entirety of WND because of one guy they have on their staff. i brought up the example of a credible organization like ESPN having a laughable guy on their staff (broussard), but that doesn't prevent the entirety of ESPN from being taken seriously.
that doesn't imply that ESPN and WND are equal. error on your part to make that assumption
Great so WND shouldn't even be mentioned in a conversation with ESPN.
lol WND
If you have a reason I should trust WND as a respected news source to frequent, let me know.
never claimed "it shouldn't be mentioned in a conversation with ESPN." discrediting an entire source because of one employee is foolish. the story in this thread (which is the first time i've ever visited that site) was credible. i have no opinion as to whether is good enough to frequent. i'd have to frequent it to come to that conclusion
Yall forgot the part where he had a felony warrant for robbery
i know ur making a funny, but the specifics of the case aren't what matters. its about the outcry of racial hate crime
The lack of a few certain posters in this thread is telling
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)