Reply With Quote
Cause you know, it's all them anti-war people clamoring for the outlaw of gay marriages.
The anti-war movement is anti-gay too, as well as racist....
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9102443/
Cause you know, it's all them anti-war people clamoring for the outlaw of gay marriages.
Pssst...JohnnyBlaze...
The far left and the far right are defined virtually the same things....racial segregation, hatred of sexuality, religious extremism and anti-semitism....
The difference is that those guys in that link were clearly the far right, as evidenced by the fact that the majority of the right does suport the war...
Meanwhile on the left...you can no longer tell where the far left is...it's just the left...
that first part is misleading, not all those deaths occured continuously and gradudually, they were punctuated events of mass death i think. Not that this is ok or anything..
And what one calls liberations another can call disruption.
People are still dying there...and just because theres less 'on avg' dying doesn't make the deaths okay.
Why must the American Soldiers seem so righteous and bold and right? Why is setting up a "democracy" considered liberation?
Its liberation just because on the surface, every citizen can vote for officials?
more like countdown till the conservative response #1234 "bush should be put on rushmoore"
I'm just glad that Whott has his finger on the pulse. I had no clue what a state the leftist liberals are in. I'm glad he can tell us exactly what they, in general terms think, feel, and do. I am also glad that noone cares what he thinks.
Your point would be?
Oh, and your Google search is deceptive because it does not tell the whole story.
Your whole liberal economic scheme has always been distribution of wealth, and destruction of private ownership. Liberals seek to Put the Power of the State above God for everyone.Liberals seek to eradicate some of the sound principles of our country that has stood the test of time.
Liberals also in every case align themselves with the socialist in every war or dispute.
Liberals and SOcialist are the same. They worship the State and abhor religious people who happen to disagree with their agenda. Liberals and Socialist both agree that the ends justify the means. THey have no moral grounds except those that further a stronger state.
thats kind of why bush and his neocon homeboys pissed all over the cons ution with the patriot act
because theyre against the power of the state
read american history dumbass and you'll find that the american govt always made special provisions and exceptions for war.
I don't think this regime plans on the Patriot act ever going away, and that is the problem. This is not a war time bill, so think a little dumbass.
Are you the judge of moral grounds? I concede that republicans own the rights to hypochritical, superficial morality. There is just not much substance to their morals. How is it that only liberals have an agenda, yet the conservatives are starting all the wars?
Your a true . You have no morals because people like you act and state that they are relative. On one occasion people like you will state that all morals are relative, and then when anyone calls you on it you ing call me a hypocritical superficial moralist???
I am no judge. But jackass libs who throw away their morality to further their agenda are sick, and sadly there are many of them. Tell me if conservatives are the only ones warmongering. Who started Vietnam. Who started Korea. who started Bosnia and Somalia??? THats right. It is liberals who think they have the moral high ground not the other way around. In another form, It is liberals who are going around and forcing morality through the courts instead of the ballot box.
And you call me a hypocrite.
Liberals believe americans dont know any better and that the state is the judge of all. liberals hold Their socialist view as the originator of morality. If it is moral for so called "nomadic" people to be ruled by a despot and american defense to be inactive by doing so; all in the name of liberal appeasement for socialist dictators so that they can sip their martinis at their Manhattan social gathering and Celebrity fundraisers, To tell the president to solve terrorism and at the same time not letting him apply the solutions to do so and thus yourselves provinding nothing as an alternative and allowing inaction so that you can turn around and say you support the war on terrorism, is absolute ! ANd i will call you on it Hypocrite.
To ing cave in on the Iraqi war and vote on the resolution to go to war because it is popular at the time and then not fund it and hope the Iraq war caves so you can capitalize and at the same time say you are strong on defense. Hypocrisy!
TO say acting unilaterally under self defense is barbaric and primitive, yet your past president(clinton) did the exact same thing and with our national interest not at stake all while using air wars and sending in "token" missiles to destroy pharmaceutical plants and doing nothing. Clinton did not ask for a vote to go to Bosnia. He executed the war on behalf of UN favor and dispensed our military as a mercenary outfit w/o public consensus and congress and yet he is hailed as a foreign policy guru.?? WTF. and then one lonely day we get attacked and Bush does the same in afghanistan and iraq and he is an idiot. By sending the troops by public and congressional mandate and only lacking support from "allies" who were trading with Sadaam.... and you ing call him a Cowboy. it seems its right to only wage war only when our interest is not at stake and we're the enforcerers of a Body of Despots-the UN, who have dictators runing the show who dont represent their people.
HYPOCRITE.
You left kooky liberals act as if your opposition to iraq is justified because there were no links to al queda, and yet you same assholes opposed Afhghanistan and told everyone that we were going to have troops come back in body bags by the thousands in Afghanistan because it was the Soviets Vietnam! You have been wrong about every thing except the WMD's not being found. ANd yet you think you are the cream of the crop when it comes to foreign policy.
Hypocrite!
The U.S lost entire continents to Soviet style Communism because of Democrats like Truman, Kennedy and Johnson. They wanted to appease the communist dictators but every time they tried they would laugh them off and tell the to f- off. Your ty appeasement has done jack . Stalin and Lennin(who the leftwing democrats worshipped) thought your party was a bag and knew they could use "useful idiots" *(what they called you in private) like yourself to further their agenda. It is a known fact that Democrat administrations turned a blind eye to Communist Infiltration thank goodness to the findings of the Army's Venoma project in the fifties. This project was uncovered to the public by Patrick Moynihan a liberal democrat of New York.
Democrats tried appeasement and it never worked. There was one time it did.. but guess who was the one who succeeded. NIXON.. Thats right. After the passing of Nixon all of China greived and held a memorial service to Nixon. What has every other dicator done for their prosty Demcorats. Jack ! Because they knew you were weak and you were tools. It finally took the outspending fury of an ailing republican president with "supposedly" a half brain in the office in the last of his administration to take down the Soviets and convince them that they couldnt compete.
And once again you and your type claim to know whats good for america!
Bull .
sad
people who like Bush have to argue against the cons ution nowadays
ing hilarious but sad
Very well written column. Point taken.
Huh.
That's all you had to say, I mean why waste all of your anger and bitterness on some boring rant. Shouldn't you be off yelling at people who don't agree with you...perhaps your kids.I am no judge.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
