Babe Ruth and Gretzky will be discredited before MJ
94 Rockets had 1 single HOF. Kenny Smith & Otis Thorpe starting?
Billups Pistons would have defeated them
Babe Ruth and Gretzky will be discredited before MJ
No one is talking about '94 in this thread.
There is no guarantee Drexler deal occurs. Otherwise the 95 team is even worse than 94 version
Well it did occur...and that team would have face raped the Bulls.
Meh. I might have traded a lose in 95 for 4 straight les 90-94.
Brah, everyone has taken a turn at Poland, its been par ioned, annexed, and wiped of the map of Europe three times by a number of different nations over its history. Including yours truly, Stalin, most successful dictator in history.
No nation in History would fight off a tripe teamed invasion. It illustrates how fearful everyone is of Poland.
How did Lenin's Invasion of Poland turn out? Poland has controlled Russian capital as well. And we didn't need to piggy back other nations to accomplish it.
Soon after the game, it was read in Spurstalk...
![]()
Couple of battles lost in 2000 years of Russian history, means scrah, and we was coasting, letting you win a couple out of pity.Polacks. Come on, brah, lets not compare Russia to Poland, that's blatantly insulting. Over its history Poland hasn't done anything of note, other than getting a train run on.
![]()
Russia is 54x the size and yet has managed an even military record against Poland [most victories occurring in the 1700's when Poland was preoccupied fending off Austria & Prussia]. How have you managed to make it 1 single time West of Poland in 2000 years and it was made possible by the Nazis, Slovaks and Prussians defeating Poland.
The more you slam Poland the worst it makes you look because you've never been able to single handily defeat a country 1/54 the size. While our history over the past 300 years consists of battling 3 nations at once, you've been busy with nationalized Jews and Georgians in power murdering Millions of your own people......and being idolized for it. Atleast Poles died fighting invaders!
Russia vs Poland
18 Wars
9 Russian victories
7 Polish victories
2 Indeterminate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Russian_War
Last edited by Infinite_limit; 02-22-2015 at 12:56 AM.
Records don't matter if you get annexed in the end. Russia won the greatest war in history of the world, WWII, among many other achievements in its history. To any sane individual comparing that to some insignificant battles lost in 1700s is re ed.This is just fact, Poland is insignificant in comparison to Russia, and many other European nations, in achievements through out their histories. It would be more fair to compare Poland to Lithuania or something. Just open any history book, there is no actual debate about this. If you weren't Polack it would be pretty obvious to you, as it is to the rest of the world. No trollin just facts. Also, multiple nations attacked Poland in its history in order to par ion it, not because Poland is so scary and tough and takes so many to take it down, but because they wanted their piece of the pie, since its such easy pickings, they didn't want their neighbours to have it all to themselves.
![]()
brah, take it easy on him, he's a fan of Putin, tbh....
lel getting your "facts" from Wikipedia; you just shot any credibility you had on the matter, you do realize any average American can edit that website, and pass it of as fact![]()
Well, I didn't say all Polacks are bad, their women do have some of biggest tatas in the world, and you'd never catch me hating on those, IMO TBH.
,
A) Poland defeated Russia 1 on 1 in 1919-21. And would have done the same in 1939 if not quadruple-teamed.
B) if Poland is so insignificant then why has Russia been repeatedly stone walled when trying to march West?
C) Link to Poland being invaded 1 on 1 and conquered? We did it to you in 1610. Moscow raised the Polish Flag.
1610: Hussars defeat a Russian Army 5 times as large, suffering only 400 casualties [this battle allowed the Poles to take Moscow]
1920: The Russians had an army of more than 5 million men and had assembled 70 divisions for Operation Vistula, while the Polish Army, with less than a million men, could field only 20 divisions to stop them [the Poles not only prevented the Soviets from physically invading Europe, but destroyed their aura of invincibility, and hence, the intoxicating appeal of inevitability]
Gigantic bully repeatedly put in it's place. Might as well call us your European Afghanistan
Last edited by Infinite_limit; 02-22-2015 at 02:14 AM.
Oh he had the killer instict like few have ever had in this game do not get me wrong, but him never losing a series or choking in a game like that is not true, everyone does it if you play the game long enough. The Pistons used to beat up on his team in the playoffs three years in a row until he finally got over the hump when Pippen grew up some and helped him out, even MJ needed help as well! As great as he was he was not perfect.
Didn't 3-1 happen two years in a row or something like that as well? If so those series must flat out haunt you as a Phx fan man, sucks. 3-1 you basically have it in the bag with a game 5 and 7 at home, that was a great series from a bball fans standpoint as I remember but for PHX fans NO.
Nevermind in 94 Phoenix won the first two in Houston and went up 2-0 and then Houston won three in a row and then won game 7 at home. They were up 2-0 going home in 94 which is just as bad IMO honestly. Two years in a row heartbreak to that Houston team, damn![]()
A) Not quite one on one, Russia was in a middle of a civil war, when the aggressor Poland attacked, hoping to take some territory, while it was distracted, it was more of a border skirmish than an all out war.So what if Russia lost one insignificant border skirmish in history against scrub Poland, only Polacks care, the rest of the world doesn't. The world does remember who won the greatest war in history, WWII and it wasn't ing Poland!!
Also, clearly math isn't your strongpoint either, since quadruple teamed means 4 on 1, but Germany and Russia double teaming Poland in 1939, that's actually only 2 on 1, dumb Polack.
Pull that crack pipe out your mouth, brah, if you think that Poland could have stood a chance vs Russia, in 1939. Polish army was inferior in men and materiel, plus outdated to the Russian one, there is no comparison, are you honestly this re ed? Poland thought cavalry division were still legit!!!
They were charging German tanks on horses!! Re ed Polacks!!
Why didn't Poland beat Germany then if you're so powerful, why did Russia have to do it, and consequently put det Polish ass under the Iron curtain for rest of the 20th century, peon.
First of name me a greater achievement than winning the greatest war in history, WWII by Russia, that Poland accomplished? Border skirmishes in 1700s don't count.
B) Russia historically hasn't been an aggressor, we don't start we finish. Poland has been, though, its actually been more aggressive historically than Russia, ignorant Polack. You start, then get ted on and finally get par ioned and annexed.Polish bully.
C)Cherry picking insignificant battles, and skirmishes, because you got defensive due to getting par ioned and annexed multiple times throughout your insignificant history. Russia doesn't even care about losing to scrub countries on occasion, we coasting brah, we not insecure like you, where one lost battle could mean your full annexation. As happened to Poland multiple times.
![]()
Polish Army
Thinking Cavalry>tanks
Charging tanks on horses
Blitzkriged by Germany in 6 weeks
...bbbut...but.. we could have won, one on one, if only Russia's 300+ divisions attacked instead
1939 Poland
Annexed
The Par ioning
Likes to argue a lot.
Throwing a perfect game while hungover is still more impressive than anything ever done on a poverty ball field. Plus, fat-ass David Wells would kick the out of any soccer player who ever lived.
These are things we know.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)