Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 76
  1. #51
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    SCIENCE, and end the conversation
    SG's topic is War on Science from the "fact-free believers" of religious and political bull .

  2. #52
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561



    Hmm, I'm conservative and believe in all of those things. With respect to anthropogenic climate change, I just don't think it's effects will be catastrophic, but that's enough to be labeled a "denier".

  3. #53
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    People that have environmental hypochondria, are probably also paranoid about vaccinations and genetically modified foods.

  4. #54
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Fake moon landers, like 9/11 twoofers, are re ed (regardless of political ideology).

  5. #55
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    You ignore the fact that science is all about being skeptical. Not consensus.
    Absolutely wrong. Consensus is reached once some claim has been tested and retested and/or proper evidence gathered by many. If some claim cannot be reproduced by many others independently, a consensus is not reached in the first place. Any claim, such as evolution, can be refuted by a minority. But until that minority counterclaim undergoes the same scrutiny and passes the test, it is a fallow claim.

    This is is what you fail to understand. Be skeptical, but understand the power of good science. And I should not par ion you as the only one who gets pleasure out of some shallow, incoherent claim that is judged as refutation of the value of what some very smart people spend their lifetime doing.

    Just walk all into the middle of a movie, pretend you wrote the script, directed it, and produced it. And then claim it's the best thing you have ever seen. Because Afterall, you can see what no one else can.
    Last edited by pgardn; 03-02-2015 at 10:52 AM.

  6. #56
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Golden rice? not this again. there's no proof that its Vit A? actually is bioavailable and actually solves Vit A deficiency in humans.

    GMO is a scam to enrich Bayer, Syngenta, Monsanto, while poisoning ground and water with glyphosate and soon anAgent Orange component.

    Also, the sterilization of ground (no insects, worms, fungus, etc) results in poor, denatured soil so the GMO crop is less complex, less nutritious.

    Resisting science? Not this straw man again. GMO is not ALL science. It's corporate profiteering while poisoning the planet. The BIG lie is that glyphosate deteriorates after a 7 - 10 days, but it's found in food, in breast milk, in placenta.
    So you stop golden rice because THE TESTS HAVE NOT BEEN concluded.
    You truly don't understand science and technology, just like your dogmatic conservative buddies. You think the idea came up in some giant corporate heads mind. You don't know the science behind it, and you have no idea of the history and current status. You are in one word, wrong.

  7. #57
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Absolutely wrong. Consensus is reached once some claim has been tested and retested and/or proper evidence gathered by many. If some claim cannot be reproduced by many others independently, a consensus is not reached in the first place. Any claim, such as evolution, can be refuted by a minority. But until that minority counterclaim undergoes the same scrutiny and passes the test, it is a fallow claim.
    Consensus needs to be 100% for that to be true. When other research also shows different results, the science is not yet settled.
    Any claim, such as evolution, can be refuted by a minority. But until that minority counterclaim undergoes the same scrutiny and passes the test, it is a fallow claim.
    That's a different argument yet.

    This is is what you fail to understand. Be skeptical, but understand the power of good science.
    I do understand the power of good science, and most papers used to back up alarmist claims are not good papers. They are filled with subjective reasoning instead of hard facts.

    One of the best scientific methods used is to do everything one can to disprove what is believed to be true. In the climate sciences, they completely shun and try to discredit anyone that does this. When this occurs, one has to believe they know their science is weak and flawed.

    And I should not par ion you as the only one who gets pleasure out of some shallow, incoherent claim that is judged as refutation of the value of what some very smart people spend their lifetime doing.
    Shallow and incoherent?

    I agree I am poor at expressing my views, but I am far from shallow. Instead of jumping to such conclusions, maybe you could give my views the benefit of doubt, and ask me to clarify.

    If you refuse to allow such a process in debate, I suggest it is you who are shallow!

    Just walk all into the middle of a movie, pretend you wrote the script, directed it, and produced it. And then claim it's the best thing you have ever seen. Because Afterall, you can see what no one else can.
    LOL...

    I find people often project their own faults on others. You sure have an active imagination. No wonder you're in fantasy land.

  8. #58
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    ?
    Consensus needs to be 100% for that to be true. When other research also shows different results, the science is not yet settled.

    Good luck then. Never believe anything.

    That's a different argument yet.

    its the same basic idea...


    I do understand the power of good science, and most papers used to back up alarmist claims are not good papers. They are filled with subjective reasoning instead of hard facts.

    Example of what you consider an alarmist scientific paper?

    One of the best scientific methods used is to do everything one can to disprove what is believed to be true. In the climate sciences, they completely shun and try to discredit anyone that does this. When this occurs, one has to believe they know their science is weak and flawed.

    All good papers are suppose to reflect upon what needs to be done in order to make the assertion even better.


    Shallow and incoherent?

    Yes. I have read your climate papers and your views.

    I agree I am poor at expressing my views, but I am far from shallow. Instead of jumping to such conclusions, maybe you could give my views the benefit of doubt, and ask me to clarify.

    If you refuse to allow such a process in debate, I suggest it is you who are shallow!

    It is tiresome to debate the same tiresome repeated arguments.

    Give me what you consider the best paper summarizing why you don't believe the Earth is in a warming trend that is alarmingly rapid. Then give me your best paper that illustrates the methods currently used to look at climate in the past are so incredibly inaccurate as to be pure folly. There is quite a bit of science that is used today to predict what things were like in the past. Maybe you can give us a paper showing there are no accurate ways to measure the approximate age of the Earth. And how many Millions of years the claims could be off. I will read all again.



    LOL...

    I find people often project their own faults on others. You sure have an active imagination. No wonder you're in fantasy land.

    I have great faith in your findings Dr Phil.
    Last edited by pgardn; 03-02-2015 at 04:49 PM.

  9. #59
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751

  10. #60
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    I said Fred Phelps was because he was a Democrat. Ran for office as a Democrat several times in the 90's, never as anything else.
    Well I guess when you need to demonize your political opponents he is a convenient guy to conflate them with. The Unabomber was a self described communist so go ahead and add him in there too right?

  11. #61
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886



    Hmm, I'm conservative and believe in all of those things. With respect to anthropogenic climate change, I just don't think it's effects will be catastrophic, but that's enough to be labeled a "denier".
    Here is you in 2008 waving your hands at sea ice which is pretty stupid because it's the land/glacial ice going into the sea which is a big part of the problem. Here it is obvious that you are trying to con people into believing there is no warming.

    Meanwhile, artic sea ice growing at fastest pace on record.

    http://www.dailytech.com/Sea+Ice+Gro...ticle13385.htm
    Here is you waving your hands at a snowstorm at a Pelosi climate rally.

    Here is you in 2009 saying its natural variation.

    UW-Milwaukee Study Could Realign Climate Change Theory

    http://www.wisn.com/weather/18935841/detail.html
    Here is you posting a story about someone deciding to not believe in climate change. It's particularly ty and goes a long way to showing how science is not high on your list of priorities. Apparently this cir stance of changing beliefs is something that is of interest to you though.

    More warming denial:

    The global temperature record of the last decade is not subjective, would you agree?


    When you see continued rising of CO2 and a declining average temperature, you have to stop and think about it.
    Here is you positing that the scientific community is scandalous:

    Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/c...eneration.html
    Here is you denying that climate models are legitimate science.

    An excellent article on climate models.

    Why Climate Modeling Is Not Climate Science

    http://theresilientearth.com/?q=cont...limate-science




    More:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...ar-record.html

    What happened to the 'warmest year on record': The truth is global warming has halted
    Not warming you say? that Darrin has us cooling now:

    Global Warming or Cooling?

    117 years of Failed Climate and Environmental Predictions

    Is our climate changing? The succession of temperate summers and open winters through several years, culminating last winter in the almost total failure of the ice crop throughout the valley of the Hudson, makes the question pertinent. The older inhabitants tell us that the Winters are not as cold now as when they were young, and we have all observed a marked diminution of the average cold even in this last decade. - New York Times June 23, 1890

    The question is again being discussed whether recent and long-continued observations do not point to the advent of a second glacial period, when the countries now basking in the fostering warmth of a tropical sun will ultimately give way to the perennial frost and snow of the polar regions - New York Times - February 24, 1895,

    The Oceanographic observations have, however, been even more interesting. Ice conditions were exceptional. In fact, so little ice has never been noted. The expedition all but established a record….Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society - January 1905
    “Fifth ice age is on the way…..Human race will have to fight for its existence against cold.” – Los Angles Times October 23, 1912


    Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada, Professor Gregory of Yale University stated that “another world ice-epoch is due.” He was the American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress and warned that North America would disappear as far south as the Great Lakes, and huge parts of Asia and Europe would be “wiped out.” – Chicago Tribune August 9, 1923

    The discoveries of changes in the sun's heat and southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to the conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age - Time Magazine 9/10/1923

    America in longest warm spell since 1776; temperature line records a 25 year rise - New York Times 3/27/1933

    “Gaffers who claim that winters were harder when they were boys are quite right…weather men have no doubt that the world at least for the time being is growing warmer.” – Time Magazine Jan. 2 1939

    A mysterious warming of the climate is slowly manifesting itself in the Arctic, engendering a "serious international problem," - New York Times - May 30, 1947

    Greenland's polar climate has moderated so consistently that communities of hunters have evolved into fishing villages. Sea mammals, vanishing from the west coast, have been replaced by codfish and other fish species in the area's southern waters. - August 29, 1954

    After a week of discussions on the causes of climate change, an assembly of specialists from several continents seems to have reached unanimous agreement on only one point: it is getting colder. - New York Times - January 30, 1961

    Like an outrigger canoe riding before a huge comber, the earth with its inhabitants is caught on the downslope of an immense climatic wave that is plunging us toward another Ice Age. - Los Angeles Times December 23, 1962

    The battle to feed humanity is over. In the 1970s, the world will undergo famines. Hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. -- Paul Ehrlich - The Population Bomb (1968)

    By 1985, air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half..." Life magazine, January 1970.

    Get a good grip on your long johns, cold weather haters--the worst may be yet to come. That's the long-long-range weather forecast being given out by "climatologists." the people who study very long-term world weather trends…. Washington Post January 11, 1970

    Because of increased dust, cloud cover and water vapor "...the planet will cool, the water vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age will be born," Newsweek magazine, January 26, 1970.

    In ten years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large areas of coastline will have to be evacuated because of the stench of dead fish. -- Paul Ehrlich, Earth Day (1970)

    "Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind. We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation," - Barry Commoner Washington University Earth Day 1970

    "(By 1995) somewhere between 75 and 85 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct." Sen. Gaylord Nelson, quoting Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, Look magazine, April 1970.

    “By the year 2000...the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America and Australia, will be in famine,” Peter Gunter, North Texas State University, The Living Wilderness, Spring 1970.

    Convection in the Antarctic Ice Sheet Leading to a Surge of the Ice Sheet and Possibly to a New Ice Age. – Science 1970

    “In the next 50 years fine dust that humans discharge into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuel will screen out so much of the sun's rays that the Earth's average temperature could fall by six degrees. Sustained emissions over five to 10 years, could be sufficient to trigger an ice age." – Washington Post - July 9, 1971

    New Ice Age Coming---It's Already Getting Colder. Some midsummer day, perhaps not too far in the future, a hard, killing frost will sweep down on the wheat fields of Saskatchewan, the Dakotas and the Russian steppes…..Los Angles Times Oct 24, 1971

    Arctic specialist Bernt Balchen says a general warming trend over the North Pole is melting the polar ice cap and may produce an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the year 2000. - Los Angles Times - May 16, 1972

    A number of climatologists, whose job it is to keep an eye on long-term weather changes, have lately been predicting deterioration of the benign climate to which we have grown accustomed….Various climatologists issued a statement that “the facts of the present climate change are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure in a decade,” If policy makers do not account for this oncoming doom, “mass deaths by starvation and probably in anarchy and violence” will result. New York Times - December 29, 1974

    Regardless of long term trends, such as the return of an Ice Age, unsettled weather conditions now appear more likely than those of the abnormally favorable period which ended in 1972. – Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society - October 10, 1975

    A RECENT flurry of papers has provided further evidence for the belief that the Earth is cooling. There now seems little doubt that changes over the past few years are more than a minor statistical fluctuation – Nature - March 6, 1975

    Scientists, these seemingly disparate incidents represent the advance signs of fundamental changes in the world’s weather. The central fact is that after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the earth’s climate seems to be cooling down. Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend, as well as over its specific impact on local weather conditions. But they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century. – The Cooling World Newsweek, April 28, 1975

    “Scientist ponder why World’s Climate is changing; a major cooling is considered to be inevitable – New York Times May 21, 1975

    This cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people. If it continues and no strong action is taken, it will cause world famine, world chaos and world war, and this could all come about before the year 2000. -- Lowell Ponte "The Cooling", 1976

    An international team of specialists has concluded from eight indexes of climate that there is no end in sight to the cooling trend of the last 30 years, at least in the Northern Hemisphere. - New York Times - January 5, 1978

    One of the questions that nags at climatologists asks when and how fast a new ice age might descend. A Belgian scientist suggests this could happen sooner and swifter than you might think. - Christian Science Monitor - Nov 14, 1979

    Evidence has been presented and discussed to show a cooling trend over the Northern Hemisphere since around 1940, amounting to over 0.5°C, due primarily to cooling at mid- and high la udes - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society - November 1980

    A global warming trend could bring heat waves, dust-dry farmland and disease, the experts said... Under this scenario, the resort town of Ocean City, Md., will lose 39 feet of shoreline by 2000 and a total of 85 feet within the next 25 years - San Jose Mercury News - June 11, 1986

    Greenhouse Effect Culprit May Be Family Car; New Ice Age by 1995?...As the tropical oceans heat up (due to increased greenhouse gases), more of their moisture is evaporated to form clouds. The increasing pole-tropic wind systems move some of these additional clouds toward the poles, resulting in increased winter rainfall, longer and colder winters and the gradual buildup of the polar ice sheets. This phenomenon has come to be widely recognized by climatologists in recent years. What most of them do not recognize is that this process may be the engine that drives the 100,000-year cycle of major ice ages, for which there is no other plausible explanation....we may be less than seven years away, and our climate may continue to deteriorate rapidly until life on earth becomes all but unsupportable.... New York Times - Larry Ephron , Director of the Ins ute for a Future - July 15, 1988

    STUDY FORESEES 86 NEW POWER PLANTS TO COOL U.S. WHEN GLOBE GETS HOTTER: Global warming could force Americans to build 86 more power plants -- at a cost of $110 billion -- to keep all their air conditioners running 20 years from now, a new study says...Using computer models, researchers concluded that global warming would raise average annual temperatures nationwide two degrees by 2010, and the drain on power would require the building of 86 new midsize power plants - Associated Press May 15, 1989

    U.N. OFFICIAL PREDICTS DISASTER SAYS GREENHOUSE EFFECT COULD WIPE SOME NATIONS OFF MAP - entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of "eco-refugees," threatening political chaos, said Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program. He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect - Associated Press June 30, 1989

    'New York will probably be like Florida 15 years from now,' - St. Louis Post-Dispatch Sept. 17, 1989

    Some predictions for the next decade (1990's) are not difficult to make... Americans may see the '80s migration to the Sun Belt reverse as a global warming trend rekindles interest in cooler climates. - Dallas Morning News December 5th 1989

    "(By) 1995, the greenhouse effect would be desolating the heartlands of North America and Eurasia with horrific drought, causing crop failures and food riots... "(By 1996) The Platte River of Nebraska would be dry, while a continent-wide black blizzard of prairie topsoil will stop traffic on interstates, strip paint from houses and shut down computers... "The Mexican police will round up illegal American migrants surging into Mexico seeking work as field hands". - Michael Oppenheimer, The Environmental Defense Fund - "Dead Heat" 1990

    Giant sand dunes may turn Plains to desert - Huge sand dunes extending east from Colorado's Front Range may be on the verge of breaking through the thin topsoil, transforming America's rolling High Plains into a desert, new research suggests. The giant sand dunes discovered in NASA satellite photos are expected to re- emerge over the next 20 to 50 years, depending on how fast average temperatures rise from the suspected "greenhouse effect," scientists believe. -Denver Post April 18, 1990

    By 2000, British and American oil will have dimished to a trickle......Ozone depletion and global warming threaten food shortages, but the wealthy North will enjoy a temporary reprieve by buying up the produce of the South. Unrest among the hungry and the ensuing political instability, will be contained by the North's greater military might. A bleak future indeed, but an inevitable one unless we change the way we live.....At present rates of exploitation there may be no rainforest left in 10 years. If measures are not taken immediately, the greenhouse effect may be unstoppable in 12 to 15 years. - 5000 Days to Save the Planet - Edward Goldsmith 1991

    ''I think we're in trouble. When you realize how little time we have left - we are now given not 10 years to save the rainforests, but in many cases five years. Madagascar will largely be gone in five years unless something happens. And nothing is happening.'' - ABC - The Miracle Planet April 22, 1990

    The planet could face an "ecological and agricultural catastrophe" by the next decade if global warming trends continue - Carl Sagan - Buffalo News Oct. 15, 1990

    Most of the great environmental struggles will be either won or lost in the 1990s and by the next century it will be too late. -- Thomas E. Lovejoy, Smithsonian Ins ution “Real Goods Alternative Energy Sourcebook,” Seventh Edition: February 1993

    Today (in 1996) 25 million environmental refugees roam the globe, more than those pushed out for political, economic, or religious reasons. By 2010, this number will grow tenfold to 200 million. - The Heat is On -The High Stakes Battle Over Earth’s Threatened Climate - Ross Gelbspan - 1996

    "It appears that we have a very good case for suggesting that the El Ninos are going to become more frequent, and they're going to become more intense and in a few years, or a decade or so, we'll go into a permanent El Nino. So instead of having cool water periods for a year or two, we'll have El Nino upon El Nino, and that will become the norm. And you'll have an El Nino, that instead of lasting 18 months, lasts 18 years," he said. - BBC November 7, 1997

    Scientists are warning that some of the Himalayan glaciers could vanish within ten years because of global warming. A build-up of greenhouse gases is blamed for the meltdown, which could lead to drought and flooding in the region affecting millions of people. - The Birmingham Post (England) July 26, 1999

    A report last week claimed that within a decade, the disease (Malaria) will be common again on the Spanish coast. The effects of global warming are coming home to roost in the developed world. - The Guardian September 11, 1999

    Officials with the Panama Canal Authority, managers of the locks and reservoirs since the United States relinquished control of the canal in 1999, warn that global warming, increased shipping traffic and bigger seagoing vessels could cripple the canal's capacity to operate within a decade. CNN November 1, 2000

    In ten years time, most of the low-lying atolls surrounding Tuvalu's nine islands in the South Pacific Ocean will be submerged under water as global warming rises sea levels, CNN Mar 29, 2001

    "Globally, 2002 is likely to be warmer than 2001 - it may even break the record set in 1998. - Daily Mirror August 2, 2002

    Next year(2003)may be warmest recorded: Global temperatures in 2003 are expected to exceed those in 1998 - the hottest year to date - Telegraph UK- December 30, 2002

    (The) extra energy, together with a weak El Nino, is expected to make 2005 warmer than 2003 and 2004 and perhaps even warmer than 1998 - Reuters February 11, 2005

    NOAA announced its predictions for the 2006 hurricane season, saying it expects an "above normal" year with 13-16 named storms. Of these storms, the agency says it expects four to be hurricanes of category 3 or above, double the yearly average of prior seasons in recorded history. With experts calling the coming hurricane season potentially worse than last year's, oil prices have jumped 70 cents per barrel in New York and made similar leaps elsewhere. Economists anticipate that demand for oil will rise sharply over the summer, when as many as four major hurricanes could hit the United States. -- Seed Magazine 5/19/06

    This year (2007) is likely to be the warmest year on record globally, beating the current record set in 1998, - ScienceDaily Jan. 5, 2007

    Very Active 2007 Hurricane Season Predicted - The U.S. Atlantic basin will likely experience a very active hurricane season, the Colorado State University forecast team announced today, increasing its earlier prediction for the 2007 hurricane season. The team's forecast now anticipates 17 named storms forming in the Atlantic basin between June 1 and Nov. 30. Nine of the 17 storms are predicted to become hurricanes, and of those nine, five are expected to develop into intense or major hurricanes (Saffir/Simpson category 3-4-5) with sustained winds of 111 mph or greater. - ScienceDaily April 3, 2007

    Warm (2007 – 2008) Winter Predicted for United States - NOAA forecasters are calling for above-average temperatures over most of the country - ScienceDailyOct. 11, 2007

    Arctic warming has become so dramatic that the North Pole may melt this summer (2008), report scientists studying the effects of climate change in the field. "We're actually projecting this year that the North Pole may be free of ice for the first time [in history]," David Barber, of the University of Manitoba, told National Geographic News aboard the C.C.G.S. Amundsen, a Canadian research icebreaker. - National Geographic News June 20, 2008
    This next quote was after you had denied that you thought that the Earth was cooling and when RG called you on it with quotes you defined your position as:

    I think the Earth has warmed an insignificant amount in the past 100 years and that this study confirms that.
    But hey now that you have gone the hedge route what is to stop you from backtracking onto your old just a few weeks later? Nothing of course:

    I don't think 10 years of data proves anything either. Serious question: how many consecutive years of "stable" or downward trending temps would be needed to "falsify" AGW theory?
    Whatever Happened to Global Warming?
    It is true that we are currently experiencing a "pause" in warming.

  12. #62
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    LOL...

    Fuzzy is a peanut counter!

  13. #63
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    How much time did Fuzzy spend on that? Creepy

  14. #64
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    I hope he doesn't report me to realitydrop or attackwatch?

  15. #65
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561

  16. #66
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    How much time did Fuzzy spend on that? Creepy
    No .

    Just proves he has one pathetic live to have to collect so much data.

    PS Fuzzy...

    I call data collectors peanut counters.

    You squirrel such facts away until they are useful...

    LOL...

    Pathetic!

  17. #67
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,898
    You squirrel such facts away until they are useful...

    LOL...

    Pathetic!
    DarrinS's own words. DarrinS wishes they'd vanish like turds in the litter box, but they keep coming back to haunt him.

    It's understandable he's slapping back at Fuzzy.

  18. #68
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    DarrinS's own words. DarrinS wishes they'd vanish like turds in the litter box, but they keep coming back to haunt him.

    It's understandable he's slapping back at Fuzzy.
    Regardless, I think it's pathetic that RandomGuy/Fuzzy keeps records of people's posts.

    I didn't read the entries, just couldn't fail to notice the enumeration of them.

    If Darrin is sorry of some of his entries, then that means he changed his mind on some. Doesn't that count for something? Do you still hold the same beliefs on every topic you did in years past?

  19. #69
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    DarrinS's own words. DarrinS wishes they'd vanish like turds in the litter box, but they keep coming back to haunt him.

    It's understandable he's slapping back at Fuzzy.
    Not really. Pointing out that projections have been exaggerated, computer models flawed, and current temp trends underwhelming is completely consistent with what I think about climate change alarmism.

  20. #70
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    How much time did Fuzzy spend on that? Creepy
    I have to read you claim that you are being unfairly labeled a denier repeatedly for awhile now and have called you on it which you poo poo and deny. I decided to take 10 minutes and utilize "DarrinS warming stopped" in the search function.

    I clicked a link, reply with quote, and some control commands 10 whole times from said list. That is the point. It's easy to find this on you. I left a whole lot out there and only tried the one set of parameters.

    From now on when you go for your whine of unfair treatment, I will just click the link in my sig, and copy and paste it again. So expect it when you try and sell us that line of again.

  21. #71
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    I have to read you claim that you are being unfairly labeled a denier repeatedly for awhile now and have called you on it which you poo poo and deny. I decided to take 10 minutes and utilize "DarrinS warming stopped" in the search function.

    I clicked a link, reply with quote, and some control commands 10 whole times from said list. That is the point. It's easy to find this on you. I left a whole lot out there and only tried the one set of parameters.

    From now on when you go for your whine of unfair treatment, I will just click the link in my sig, and copy and paste it again. So expect it when you try and sell us that line of again.

    Oh. Please don't. I'm trembling....Nooooooooooooooooooo!



    You go ahead and copy, paste, bump, or whatever you feel you need to do.

  22. #72
    Veteran Aztecfan03's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    4,292
    Well I guess when you need to demonize your political opponents he is a convenient guy to conflate them with. The Unabomber was a self described communist so go ahead and add him in there too right?
    Was talking about religious nuts...

  23. #73
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    Was talking about religious nuts...
    So? You were trying to come up with people to compare Inofe, Santorum, Lee, Robertson to from the opposition and the best you could come up with was a guy that never even won a primary and a black preacher whose link is that a politician is in his congregation. Nevermind that OTOH you have committee chairs and leadership posts in the party.

    The GOP put Inhofe in chair of the science committee and you want to say that both sides have their equal amount of religious nuts? Shall we examine local government action like with say school boards?

  24. #74
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    How many of those are common tea party beliefs?
    Not many. The list is a mix of liberal/conservative/neutral dumb .

  25. #75
    Veteran Aztecfan03's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    4,292
    So? You were trying to come up with people to compare Inofe, Santorum, Lee, Robertson to from the opposition and the best you could come up with was a guy that never even won a primary and a black preacher whose link is that a politician is in his congregation. Nevermind that OTOH you have committee chairs and leadership posts in the party.

    The GOP put Inhofe in chair of the science committee and you want to say that both sides have their equal amount of religious nuts? Shall we examine local government action like with say school boards?
    I said off the top of my head. I don't search forall the dumb things liberals say like you and boutons do.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •