You know the story? Looks pretty damn real to me.
By real world you mean jungle? Sure. Dominant? No, but they do have an advantage. Now the "real world" of an open field? Now THAT would be dominant.
This is staged..:l>plus that's a bengal not a siberian
but yeah I think we're arguing about two totally different things.
In the real world of predators, Tigers would dominate...
If it's a cage fight, I doubt tigers can use any of their advantages.
You know the story? Looks pretty damn real to me.
By real world you mean jungle? Sure. Dominant? No, but they do have an advantage. Now the "real world" of an open field? Now THAT would be dominant.
The only way to solve this is start a GoFundMe to parachute drop a grizzly into the Eastern Russian birch forests and film it taking on siberian tigers.
I was reading up on Grizzlies and the best practice now is to lay prone (on your stomach) and put your hands behind your head and neck.
Bears don't give a , they eat your ass and legs first so you'd probably be in excruciating pain and fear for about an hour before you die.
Best practice is to be loud so they can hear you, spray it with bear spray it if doesn't flee when it sees you (highly unlikely), and then shoot it with a .44 Magnum if it comes back at you after the bear spray (extremely unlikely).
You're absolutely correct...in the case of a black bear (which is immensely smaller than a Grizzly). In the case of a Grizzly you're ed unless you have your bear spray or at least a 44 magnum. I don't think a 357 or 45 would hurt it.
Also what I've heard is to run away downhill. Grizzlies are prone to falling and tumbling over themselves since they're so massive.
You never run from a bear. That's a ludicrous suggestion, a bear on all fours will have way better balance than you will running down a mountain.
SpursforSix is the only person I've known to escape a bear. He outran one.
No he didn't, the bear raped him. He was easier to mount while facing downhill.
He was wearing his wooden Beats By Dre. I saw them, they were mauled beyond recognition but still sound clearer than any Sennheiser, tbh..
They always eat a woman's genitals as well. In their dung pile they'll be the bush, hair and all. No jokin' around either.
Bend over, I'll show you mauled beyond recognition.
Wtf does that mean. Why would a bear eat a woman and leave the genitals. I doubt it's a conscious decision. It'd be weirder if the beat ate everything and left the crotch sitting there in the dirt.
LMAO!!!
No. The bear eats the genitals every time. The proof is in their dung,,,the pubic mound and hair is in there.
You're saying the pubic mound isn't digestible?
Yes, it's easily recognized in the dung. They had a series of the attacks in the mid to late '60's in Glacier National Park where they had to track these killer Grizzlies and found the genitals in the dung each time.
So like a vagina? They found a vagina in bear poop?
Were they still able at least?
I would never have sex with a vagina I found in some bear stool.
You been in the backcountry a couple of weeks and I guarantee that'll look like some good pussy
I'll say it again. I wouldn't put my weiner in a semi digested feces covered vag. I mean...I might look at it and masturbate some. But nothing else.
A drop of bleach and a couple of shakes in the lake and it's good as new.
Ludicrous. The bleach would make it smell sterile. I'd just as soon a bandaid with some hair stuck to it.
Of course, it's a honey pot.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)