Reply With Quote
Why is that stupid?Well apparently Cruz knows how to secure a military base better than generals.
he's clown car stupid.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/0...3.html?hp=l1_3
Well apparently Cruz knows how to secure a military base better than generals.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/0...3.html?hp=l1_3
Why is that stupid?Well apparently Cruz knows how to secure a military base better than generals.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/0...3.html?hp=l1_3
... because Krazy Kruz said it. No need to analyze further.
That's funny that you didn't mean that to be facetious.
Certainly could have made a difference at Fort Hood.
It genuinely scares me that someone as crazy as this fool could potentially become the most powerful man in the free world.
yep, one occurrence justifies arming 100% of every person on all bases.
I haven't looked, but wonder what GHW Bush's reasoning was when he signed off on the ban of concealed weapons on bases.
Was there an incident that spurred it?
I said it in the sentence itself. If you still have trouble identify the prepositional phrase let me know. Reading is Fundamental.
Cruz Campaign Accuses Paul and Rubio of Wimping Out on Gun Rights After Newtown
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has launched one of the first R-on-R attacks, and he has done so regarding an issue of primal importance to the Republican voting base: guns.
A few days ago, Cruz’s presidential campaign zapped out an email hitting up conservatives for donations. The solicitation showed Cruz, the tea party favorite, wearing a bright orange hunting vest, with a shotgun on his shoulder, and its message was stark: Send me money so I can support your Second Amendment rights, which "serve as the ultimate check against government tyranny." Cruz warned that he was "under attack from the left-wing media and even Republicans who want to label me as an extremist—all for supporting a fundamental right." And then he took a shot at the other GOP 2016 contestants: "I'm the only candidate running for President who not only believes in the Cons utional right to keep an dear arms—but has the record of fighting for it, tooth and nail."
The only Republican 2016er who's a proven crusader for gun rights? That was quite the claim—and a dig at everyone else in the crowded field, particularly the other GOPers who are competing for tea party and conservative voters. After all, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) has declared himself a champion of gun rights. He has longsupported the National Association for Gun Rights—a group that hypes itself as theconservative alternative to the NRA. Rand Paul often signs email solicitations for this outfit, such as one that asserted that President Barack Obama and the UN were plotting to "CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL 'unauthorized' civilian firearms.'"
(Paul was not invited to the NRA’s recent convention—because, NGAR president Dudley Brown claimed, "Paul is more pro-gun that the NRA.") Paul has repeatedly moved to eviscerate the gun laws of Washington, DC. And prior to becoming a senator, he campaigned at a gun rights rally with armed militia members who noted that guns could be used to prevent "progressive socialists" from thwarting Second Amendment and other rights. That is, Paul has established a rather die-hard stance on guns.
Yet that did not stop Cruz from depicting himself as the only true and tested advocate for gun rights in the Republican's 2016 gang.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...bio-gun-rights
So, Krazy Kruz is a slandering liar, knowing you ignorant, gun fellatin tea baggers will fall for his lies every time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions