Reply With Quote
That's it mid. Let it all out. I can tell you are hurting. I'm here for you son.It's pretty sad when the greatest accomplishment in a sport franchise's history is "We lost to Michael Jordan!"
They threw a parade for that
Proof of NOT being hungry: Winning only 50 games during the regular season after winning your third straight le:Proof of being hungry please
I have this: beat the 3 peat champs and a 2 time defending champions.
You have none. Now go back to the room where you keep your championship trophies I'm sure there's plenty of space for you to sleep there.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/.../NBA_2003.html
That's it mid. Let it all out. I can tell you are hurting. I'm here for you son.It's pretty sad when the greatest accomplishment in a sport franchise's history is "We lost to Michael Jordan!"
Proof of being hungry please
I have this: beat the 3 peat champs and a 2 time defending champions.
You have none. Now go back to the room where you keep your championship trophies I'm sure there's plenty of space for you to sleep there.
Yes. The Lakers thought they could coast with the likes of Rick Fox and win a FOURTH straight le. But they lost and realized they had to focus and regroup.
They did and took care of the Spurs the next year.
Who was the first team we beat in that run?
100%false
Jaime, how do you handle disappointing seasons tbh? Would love to hear some advice.That's it mid. Let it all out. I can tell you are hurting. I'm here for you son.
please
I have a few sites I frequent.
I have a few sites I frequent.
The Dallas Cowboy's Suck Ass Support Group forum?I have a few sites I frequent.
Face it, no other team in sports have the consistency and level of success as us. We've been in the hunt for 15 years practically every season while most other teams hardly make the playoffs that consistently and burn out on bum talents and have no real championship core.
The Lakers made a joke of themselves as of late. I'll take 5 championships and 15 years of success over a threepeat one time in the 2000s over any of that.
Bbbbut you feasted on weak teams who just 3peated and on their way to a 3peat!!!!
Face it, no other team in sports have hte consistency and level of success as us. We've been in the hunt for 15 years practically every season while most other teams hardly make the playoffs that consistently and burn out on bum talents and have no real championship core.
The Lakers made a joke of themselves as of late. I'll take 5 championships and 15 years of success over a threepeat one time in the 2000s over any of that.
Who's your team?
The Lakers of the NFL.
If 5 championships and 7 finals appearances in the span of 10 years isnt a dynasty, then its an impossible measurement to reach. Salty ass spurs fans
If you're talking about sports in general, Patriots are arguably as good.
Face it, no other team in sports have the consistency and level of success as us. We've been in the hunt for 15 years practically every season while most other teams hardly make the playoffs that consistently and burn out on bum talents and have no real championship core.
The Lakers made a joke of themselves as of late. I'll take 5 championships and 15 years of success over a threepeat one time in the 2000s over any of that.
Each decade since 1980 had a Dynasty, TBE
80s - Lakers (5)
90s - Bulls (6)
2000s - Lakers (4)
2010s - TBD
I take comfort in the fact that it will forever be Duncan > Kobe
I agree, I think we have become unrealistic as fans. We expect a team to win 6-7 championships within 8 years now a days to call them a dynasty. It's unrealistic in todays sports. While I have a tremendous amount of respect for MJ and feel like he played in a nasty and tough era of basketball from a physical standpoint, it was a weak ass era from a basketball stand point.
No matter how MJ tries to spin it, his Bulls would have been eviscerated had they faced some of the ridiculously tough teams of the last few years.
Diaw leaving the Suns bench to tell Pop he wanted to be here for 5
What a re ed take.
Lol prime but bored
Uh we also beat that championship okc team and griz,
I'm fine with the Shaq Lakers being above the spurs. But to say the gasol Lakers and LeBron heat weren't equally lucky is dumb.
Looks like we have 2000s as co champs since the lack of continuity between Shaq and gasol Lakers makes it two separate dynasty. The latter team of course being not a dynasty.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
