If volume shooting and ball hogging doesn't mean "chucker" what does? Just because you have a special personal definition of what chucker means it doesn't mean we normal people with normal looking hands have to follow it, tbh.
Until you understand the concept of chucking, stop pretending you've seen anything to counter my argument.
Ball hawg does not equal chucker
Volume shooter does not equal chucker
Curry wasn't the MVP in 2013, when I made the statements I made. Get your straight, Dumb Ass Faggot. The only reason the Warriors are as good as they are now is because their tendency to play to the crowd has been somewhat reined in.
If volume shooting and ball hogging doesn't mean "chucker" what does? Just because you have a special personal definition of what chucker means it doesn't mean we normal people with normal looking hands have to follow it, tbh.
The Warriors are loaded. But I guess Curry is the best player on the best team. So that means something.
You need to get it straight and get with the ESPN/NBA media program...
If you beat the Warriors, they were the best team in the league. If they beat you, you lost to the team with the best record.
How many times does this need to be shown to you? Originally, in 2013, this was a response to you asking the same ing question after making the same stupid comparison.
Unless the trophy is for who can draw the most bull fouls, Harden doesn't deserve it.
that guy and his ruination of the game of basketball.
Imagine if the Spurs met the Rockets in round 2. Between hack a howard and Harden's flopping to get to the line, there would be 70FTA a game. That would be exciting.
I don't agree at all. If a player takes a bad shot here and there it doesn't mean that player is a chucker.
If the player routinely takes bad shots, it does. Make your own definition, I gave you mine years ago.
If you rutinely take one or two bad shots per game you aren't a chucker. A chucker is a player that takes enough bad shots per game (or ballhogs enough) to get his teammates out of rythm.
BTW, just saw Curry's acceptence speech. What's with all the MVP winners crying now?
You're not only ignorant, you're blithering.
Curry received 100 first place votes, Harden 25, and LeBron 5. It wasn't even close.
Sure. Curry won the MVP (and will probably win the championship and finals MVP) just a couple of season after you posted this:
And I'm the one blithering. ing dumbass![]()
Kobe won the MVP
But he lost the game for his team, up 16 with under 5 minutes to play in a crucial playoff game AFTER I called him out, and it got so silent in that thread you could hear a season drop. So he gets a regular season award 2 years later and you're speculating he'll win the Finals MVP. If he does, it's because he changed his game, not because he's such an anomaly he can shoot anytime he wants from anywhere on the floor and it be a good shot selection.
How's Blair these days by the way? You know, the "beast that other teams missed out on"?
You need to spend some time learning the game of basketball so regular people like me don't have to explain it to you over and over, or are you autistic?
Did I have ever say that? I'm not sure but I doubt it. I found out pretty early how much Blair sucked, tbh.
And no, Curry hasn't changed much his game. He was never the chucker you seem to think he is/was.
Blithering
After he was the best rookie ever.I'm not sure but I doubt it. I found out pretty early how much Blair sucked, tbh.![]()
Yes he has.And no, Curry hasn't changed much his game. He was never the chucker you seem to think he is/was.
-There's some give and take,” Kerr said. “Obviously [Curry is] so skilled and talented that you give him a lot of rope. Every once in awhile you have to reel him in if if you think that he's trying to do too much or missing something strategically that we're trying to do. You just tell him. He's easy to talk to. I'm really, really lucky to coach a star player who's so willing to accept criticism and respond positively to critiquing.”
Mark Jackson didn't try to reel him in. He let Curry do whatever he wanted, and though it was pleasing to the eye, it didn't equate to winning basketball in the post season. Kerr knows about being a great 3pt shooter, though he was never the talent Curry is. He knows about striking that balance.
How could Curry respond to criticism yet not change anything about his game?
Its a new generation and they are trying to get more endorsements by having a Disney type moment by crying.
Curry's 3pt attempts this year set a career high. 3rd most in nba history
Didnt he break his own record of 3s made in RS?
yes. but i was talking about attempts
Wishing our new guy to be good =/= saying he was gonna be a beast
Is that bad he took that many attempts?
He improved his game and adapted to what Kerr asked of him. That doesn't mean he was chucker before, tbh.
Let's not forget you also said he was overrated, you are conveniently leaving that part out on your saving face attempts. The overrated player just won MVP and is favoured to win the championship.
You made a wrong assesment about a player, everybody comits those mistakes from time to time, it's no big deal. The problem is you being a got and not owning up to it despite knowing you were wrong about it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)