Amateur: Why can't DMC ever accept he is wrong?

[DMC]

When you call someone overrated, you are usually commenting on a career defining trait, tbh. Either way, you weren't even right in the moment you made the comment, that's why everybody jumped at your stupid opinion from the get go.

BTW, I thought you made all this just to have people "chasing you around", why are you still trying to defend the argument?

I was proven right. The Warriors were up by 16 points with 5 minutes to play in regulation in SA, in the 2nd round. Curry went on a chucking spree and the Spurs picked up 16 points in just 5 minutes, forced overtime and won the game. I posted the play by play and highlighted the offending shots by Curry. You and many others ignored it and there was nary a peep out of youns until the following seasons when Curry would go off in the RS again. Of course after his 1st round exit, nary a peep until the next RS.

I said he's a phenomenal shooter, I acknowledged that. I said his shot selection is poor and that the entire team needs to move the ball more. They began to do that more after Kerr came aboard (Jackson was a hero baller coach, momma there goes that man). I said Jackson should be fired. He was. I said the team has potential, it did. I also said Steph tends to go back to that chucking style in tight situations, as if the trust for the "system" hasn't fully taken roots just yet. (That's a major difference between the Spurs and the GSW and many other teams; old guys with corporate knowledge not only trust the system, it's pretty much all they know by now. New guys come in and that's how "we" play. Other teams get taught about it by a new coach, but they regress to their old ways and "fitna save us" style of play because it's how they grew up, how they've always played.)

So yeah, I was right. He was a chucker and he was overrated. Thinking his contested 30' shot is a better look than anyone else's open 24' look is not good basketball sense. "Yeah that would be a bad shot for anyone else to take, but not for Steph" as Curry chucks the team out of contention once again. As you saw against Memphis the other night, when the shot isn't falling you have to have a system that works, which means the shot itself should be an integral part of the system.

I've said countless times that him taking 3's in the flow of the offense is fine, make or miss, but out of rhythm shots just past the half court, those are problematic, and in the playoffs every possession is supposed to count. No so much in Houston it seems, but still.

It wasn't this that caused you to chase me around. It was the way I said you're a blithering idiot. Your reading comprehension skills are severely lacking, could be a language barrier issue, who knows.

[DMC]

Obviously, he's old, rancid, with a large touch of latent sexuality & a need to dress in women's lingerie.

Let's keep our private lives private..mmkay?

[Killakobe81]

I was proven right. The Warriors were up by 16 points with 5 minutes to play in regulation in SA, in the 2nd round. Curry went on a chucking spree and the Spurs picked up 16 points in just 5 minutes, forced overtime and won the game. I posted the play by play and highlighted the offending shots by Curry. You and many others ignored it and there was nary a peep out of youns until the following seasons when Curry would go off in the RS again. Of course after his 1st round exit, nary a peep until the next RS.

I said he's a phenomenal shooter, I acknowledged that. I said his shot selection is poor and that the entire team needs to move the ball more. They began to do that more after Kerr came aboard (Jackson was a hero baller coach, momma there goes that man). I said Jackson should be fired. He was. I said the team has potential, it did. I also said Steph tends to go back to that chucking style in tight situations, as if the trust for the "system" hasn't fully taken roots just yet. (That's a major difference between the Spurs and the GSW and many other teams; old guys with corporate knowledge not only trust the system, it's pretty much all they know by now. New guys come in and that's how "we" play. Other teams get taught about it by a new coach, but they regress to their old ways and "fitna save us" style of play because it's how they grew up, how they've always played.)

So yeah, I was right. He was a chucker and he was overrated. Thinking his contested 30' shot is a better look than anyone else's open 24' look is not good basketball sense. "Yeah that would be a bad shot for anyone else to take, but not for Steph" as Curry chucks the team out of contention once again. As you saw against Memphis the other night, when the shot isn't falling you have to have a system that works, which means the shot itself should be an integral part of the system.

I've said countless times that him taking 3's in the flow of the offense is fine, make or miss, but out of rhythm shots just past the half court, those are problematic, and in the playoffs every possession is supposed to count. No so much in Houston it seems, but still.

It wasn't this that caused you to chase me around. It was the way I said you're a blithering idiot. Your reading comprehension skills are severely lacking, could be a language barrier issue, who knows.

LOL, Talk about paragraphs not needed ...

[DMC]

LOL, Talk about paragraphs not needed ...

LOL talk about someone being asshurt and dragging it to another thread.

[Killakobe81]

LOL talk about someone being asshurt and dragging it to another thread.

Just using your own words against you ...nothing from the other thread mentioned (topics-wise) you keep failing all over the place ... nice work!

[DAF86]

I was proven right. The Warriors were up by 16 points with 5 minutes to play in regulation in SA, in the 2nd round. Curry went on a chucking spree and the Spurs picked up 16 points in just 5 minutes, forced overtime and won the game. I posted the play by play and highlighted the offending shots by Curry. You and many others ignored it and there was nary a peep out of youns until the following seasons when Curry would go off in the RS again. Of course after his 1st round exit, nary a peep until the next RS.

I said he's a phenomenal shooter, I acknowledged that. I said his shot selection is poor and that the entire team needs to move the ball more. They began to do that more after Kerr came aboard (Jackson was a hero baller coach, momma there goes that man). I said Jackson should be fired. He was. I said the team has potential, it did. I also said Steph tends to go back to that chucking style in tight situations, as if the trust for the "system" hasn't fully taken roots just yet. (That's a major difference between the Spurs and the GSW and many other teams; old guys with corporate knowledge not only trust the system, it's pretty much all they know by now. New guys come in and that's how "we" play. Other teams get taught about it by a new coach, but they regress to their old ways and "fitna save us" style of play because it's how they grew up, how they've always played.)

So yeah, I was right. He was a chucker and he was overrated. Thinking his contested 30' shot is a better look than anyone else's open 24' look is not good basketball sense. "Yeah that would be a bad shot for anyone else to take, but not for Steph" as Curry chucks the team out of contention once again. As you saw against Memphis the other night, when the shot isn't falling you have to have a system that works, which means the shot itself should be an integral part of the system.

I've said countless times that him taking 3's in the flow of the offense is fine, make or miss, but out of rhythm shots just past the half court, those are problematic, and in the playoffs every possession is supposed to count. No so much in Houston it seems, but still.

It wasn't this that caused you to chase me around. It was the way I said you're a blithering idiot. Your reading comprehension skills are severely lacking, could be a language barrier issue, who knows.

Which is it son: You are trolling or you are so serious that you need to write walls of words? Because you keep switching left and right.

P/S: No matter how many words you write, we (and when I say "we" I include you too) all know you were and still are wrong.