Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 58 of 58
  1. #51
    ex Hornets78 Pelicans78's Avatar
    My Team
    New Orleans Pelicans
    Post Count
    15,822
    The reason why boxing isn't popular is due to the heavyweight being dominated by two guys who won't ever fight each other and who haven't been challenged in years. The heavyweight fights really move the needle in boxing. Sure the little maggots can have their fame for a few years like in the early to mid 80s, but after awhile the heavyweights have to step up which happened once Tyson and Holyfield came along followed by others.

  2. #52
    coffee is for closers Infinite_limit's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    8,148
    The reason why boxing isn't popular is due to the heavyweight being dominated by two guys who won't ever fight each other and who haven't been challenged in years. The heavyweight fights really move the needle in boxing. Sure the little maggots can have their fame for a few years like in the early to mid 80s, but after awhile the heavyweights have to step up which happened once Tyson and Holyfield came along followed by others.
    Or its no longer popular because it's today a ty product

  3. #53
    Chillin' like a villain... TampaDude's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    20,120
    Pretty much this for me. It's why I think boxing isn't as popular anymore. Mayweather doesn't really go toe-to-toe throwing punches. Is it smart? Sure. Does it prolong his career? Definitely. But just not something I'm willing to spend money to see.
    ^ this

    We're all waiting for the next Mike Tyson. Will he ever come along? Who the knows?

    The so called Mayweather-Pacquiao "fight" was a traveshamockery. Why do you think they were both smiling after the fight? They played the suckers and are laughing all the way to the bank.

  4. #54
    Believe. Mr Bones's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    2,231
    I think the 10 point must system is the least sophisticated scoring system in sports. In any other sport, dominance in an inning or a quarter matters and carries over to the final outcome . If the Tigers outscore the Yankees 4-1 in the first inning and then the Yankees outscore the Tigers 1-0 in the second inning, the Tigers are still ahead 4-2. In boxing, the fighters are even at that point, with a 19-19 score because each fighter has won one round 10-9. The 10 point must system doesn't even use numbers 1 thru 6, and 7s are incredibly rare. Landing 5 more punches in a round will likely get you a 10-9 win in the round, just as landing 25 or 45 more punches will. In basketball, one team can lose the first three quarters by small margins, but still win the game with a great 4th quarter. That's nearly impossible in boxing, barring a knockout. A boxing judge can honestly think that one boxer landed more shots overall, and landed more good shots, but still be compelled by the system to award the other fighter the win due to multiple rounds of close, uninteresting, and just barely measurable wins. It's just a bad scoring system.

  5. #55
    coffee is for closers Infinite_limit's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    8,148
    I think the 10 point must system is the least sophisticated scoring system in sports. In any other sport, dominance in an inning or a quarter matters and carries over to the final outcome . If the Tigers outscore the Yankees 4-1 in the first inning and then the Yankees outscore the Tigers 1-0 in the second inning, the Tigers are still ahead 4-2. In boxing, the fighters are even at that point, with a 19-19 score because each fighter has won one round 10-9. The 10 point must system doesn't even use numbers 1 thru 6, and 7s are incredibly rare. Landing 5 more punches in a round will likely get you a 10-9 win in the round, just as landing 25 or 45 more punches will. In basketball, one team can lose the first three quarters by small margins, but still win the game with a great 4th quarter. That's nearly impossible in boxing, barring a knockout. A boxing judge can honestly think that one boxer landed more shots overall, and landed more good shots, but still be compelled by the system to award the other fighter the win due to multiple rounds of close, uninteresting, and just barely measurable wins. It's just a bad scoring system.
    Agreed

  6. #56
    1ST BALLOT HOF Buddy Mignon's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    7,098
    Problem is MW is so unlikeable with such a bad past (plus his reading level is offensive) that no one will appreciate his style even if they should. He's a terrible person to have as the face of a sport.
    When I first came to this site... the Spurs organization were hailed as a bunch of choir boys that did no wrong. Seven later after being stood up at the alter by . Parker ing Barry's wife... yeah... that's what really caused both divorces. Neal raping. GM drunk driving... and Jim cucking... we see that everyone has some going on.

  7. #57
    Executive Mitch's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    6,573
    Problem is MW is so unlikeable with such a bad past (plus his reading level is offensive) that no one will appreciate his style even if they should. He's a terrible person to have as the face of a sport.
    Mayweather's past is beating a woman and not being a great reader.

    You know who cares about that? The people who want him to lose.
    You know who buys his fights? The people who want him to lose.
    You know who headlines the 3 highest grossing boxing matches in history? The man people want to lose.

  8. #58
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    77,863
    So then you think boxing is doing well.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •