I believe we must difference between being a troll and supporting, having a good opinion of your own players. I've seen Sarunas play both at European and International level, and he has been a top 10 international player for the last 5 years. He is an amazing talent, has high Basketball IQ, can lead a team offense, run the point, or play as a shooting guard, and has a very good three-point shot. His passing skills are very good too. He is clutch, a leader, and he makes things happen. He might not be a penetrator, but when his 3s start rainning, defenders will leave him the line open, and he can penetrate and kick it out or dish to a big man.
Of course he is unproven at NBA level, his man to man defense is doubtful (specially against quick point guards), and he would need at least a year to adapt to the system. The latter because he was the team 1st. or 2nd. option wherever he played, while in Indiana he will have to adapt to a different role, but as I said, he has a high basketball IQ, so that might help him in the transition.
About the question that started the topic. Well, it's hard to say where would a 30-year old player be selected in the draft, and if it was when he was 22 or 23, back then he wasn't the same player than he is right now.
If he was the player that he is right now at 22 years old, he would have been a top five pick without a doubt. If 30 years old players could be drafted, then he would be drafted from pick #15 and on.
Ok, then, I defended your opinion believing you weren't a troll. I was mistaken. Oberto has been there with Sarunas as a top international player for the last 5 years (at least), and both are unproven in the NBA. Why Sarunas would adapt better than Oberto? There you have no reason to state such a thing. The odds would be better for Oberto, who was the last International player to adapt to Indiana? Rik Smits?