Reply With Quote
You seem to missing the links I asked for. Where is all of this mainstream coverage you speak of?
And your question was already answered. I'd want the same coverage as 50 white teens beating up an elderly black man.
Answered. The answer is yes.
Nice moving the goalposts, by the way.
And also nice continued dodging of the question.
What level of coverage do you want regarding the arrest of suspects in a beating of a man in Baltimore?
You seem to missing the links I asked for. Where is all of this mainstream coverage you speak of?
And your question was already answered. I'd want the same coverage as 50 white teens beating up an elderly black man.
You already found it. How could you be missing something you already found?
So you want it to have as much coverage as everything that happens in your imagination.And your question was already answered. I'd want the same coverage as 50 white teens beating up an elderly black man.
That's unrealistic tbh.
And you continue to fail to back up your claim.
Try not making stuff up next time.
Where is this abundance of mainstream media coverage you speak of chump? Still waiting for these links and articles you keep mentioning.
You already found and mentioned the mainstream media links and I have already given you a link to them.
Is this really that difficult for you?
you linked nothing.
The two I found are what you consider an abundance?
So the local news in like somewhere in bastrop is MSM coverage?
I'm actually not gonna side on the fact that he's a sore loser, but that he's a legitimate idiot or suffers from severe Dunning Kruger. He thinks that 4 local media sources from the same metro area and a tabloid in england is MSM coverage.
I guess if you are in the local news for winning a chilli cook off, that means it's mainstream coverage.
It used to be that we'd give chumpdumper the benefit of the doubt and conclude that he's just playing a semantic game, now it's not certain.
He really is a complete dumbass.
Sure I did. You quoted the link and commented on it.
False premise. You found more than two.The two I found are what you consider an abundance?
Go tend your dog David
I clicked your link, scanned through the results, and said your link supported my claim, the mainstream media ignored it. Why do you refuse to post your links backing your claim and proving the mainstream media didn't ignore it? Post your mainstream media links here one by one.
Who is David?
You saw them all. You tried to move the goalposts and redefine mainstream media, but you can't.
Sorry, you failed to back up your claim. Nothing supported your claim because you can't provide one equivalent example. The example exists only in your mind and your imagined media response means nothing.
My claim was the MSM ignored it, therefore there are no MSM examples to provide you.
Continue on not providing links to all the MSM stories you have found, it's really helping your case.
Already did. I have no idea why you insist that local network affiliates and large daily newspapers are alternative media, but they aren't.
Your continued failure on this front is really helping your case.
I consider "Mainstream Media" ABC, NBC, CBS, New York Times. It's just not covered.
try this "top 100" http://whitegirlbleedalot.com/top-10...olence-videos/
Your refusal to post the individual links speaks volumes. Post them up or I'm done in here.
You already saw them.
Why post them again?
I said your link proved my point.
why do continue to refuse to post them?
Chomsky just rolled over in his grave. The bifurcation between mainstream and alternative is cute but fallacious. It's media, it doesn't have to be mainstream or alternative. If I have a blog news site and I report pretty much what CNN, CBS, NBC and ABC report, am I main stream? If CNN posts a column that has a differing viewpoint than other outlets have, are they suddenly alternative?
No, the affiliate is not mainstream. It's a smaller organization that gets it's information from sources like the AP or UPI (not sure that second one is still even around). Main stream organizations are those who have resources to originate stories through reporting and investigation. Affiliates piggy back on the name and tap into the stories of the MSM.
So until one of the big players picks it up and features it, it's not being covered by the MSM.
Then you have this:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/08/06/...pi.hate.crime/
That's mainstream coverage.
So why did CBS News run a story about this with information from its local affiliate?
Define "run a story".
If you go to their website and search their home page or the US home page, Richard Fletcher isn't there at all, but this is:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/joseph-k...ut-positively/
Did you see the story on CBS news, or did you Google it after the OP posted and find an instance of CBS in the URL?
Why haven't other outlets picked up on it?
Where's the outrage?
Are you outraged?
So now you have moved the goalposts yet further just to include the evening broadcast of CBS News.
OK.
Good afternoon Mr. Chumpdumper,
If you can spare some time today please provide me with actual links of the MSM covering OP's topic so I can PM Kori and ask that the thread be deleted due to being made under false pretense.
Regards,
Mr. TSA
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
