So you are saying living things get better because there is some ultimate living anatomical design that has yet to be "created"? Makes no sense.
No dip I'm saying living things are supposed to get better based on the basic theory and DEFINITION of evolution. You know from bugs to small mammals to monkeys to human. You know that type of stupid evolutionary theory you clowns believe in. You make your own argument only to shoot it down. What? Do you have scrambeled eggs between your ears? 
It goes like this. And it goes like this because it appears to have happened quite a few times.
When large environmental changes take place mass extinctions occur.
So tell what large environmental change took place? The big bang? That's not an environmental change that affected exisitng life. It would be a change that started life accorrding to your re ed evolutionary theory. Organisms that survive the cataclysmic effect make more like themselves but always containing some variation.
So tell me more about the cataclysmic effect you speak of. What specific event in the annals of time are you referring to? It might be a certain marine algae that can photosynthesize under low light conditions that survive.
Again your talking about existing ecosystems right? I'm talking the genesis. After the big bang how did bug life forms that would eventually evolve into what we are now 
know to automatically procreate if it didnt feel good. Or were the bugs much more advanced in the early evolutionary stages till they would just touch each other and reproduce off spring. If thats the case that would be the opposite of evolution . Let's say environmental conditions somewhat stabilize and there are very few variant body forms that remain, but an abundance of new environmental niches have been created. Those niches appear to get filled with the living designs of those that survived. But they become very different over time because there are so many different niches to fill through natural selection "choosing" from the less abundant variations left that are best adapted to the new niches. A reading of the desert pupfish in the western U.S. is a very interesting micro evolutionary example that shows how macro evolution can occur. There are many others.
Again you need to explain what cataclysmic event has occured on the earth to pre-existing life forms. In other words what started natural selection.
Evolution and speciation are not as easy as some make it out to be. But the basics are fairly straight forward. There are still many questions remaining such as the pace of evolution. But it appears there is no ultimate body form based on science because there is just no such thing given that the environment changes so radically over time.
How did the first environment to sustain the bugs come to be and why or how after natural selection occured they knew to reproduce. If intelligence due to natural selection comes from nothing then why in the do we have to study to learn. Are you saying evolution comes with built in intelligence?
And this is way too long but basically on point as to why your statement makes no sense. If one did have to name the most ubiquitous and long surviving form it would have to be prokaryotes, bacteria. If you want more complex forms you would have to choose beetles (~100,000 species and counting)
Reply With Quote
! It's the best feeling in the world! But your right. Girls are expensive, evil cerebral assassins, cuckholding hypergamous s, only think about how they could use us, etc, but sexing them up and giving us a chance to procreate is the reason they are here.
