Reply With Quote
So you have nothing backing up your claim and are just being emotional per the par. Neat.
Cir stantial evidence and speculation are enough for me to declare you guilty in the court of my personal opinion
So you have nothing backing up your claim and are just being emotional per the par. Neat.
Lol emotional
I don't care to back up my opinion that you're a crappy lawyer. Your awful posts are scattered around here for you or anyone else to see.
And lol CC's endorsement does you no favors either.
Right, you're being emotional. We get it.
Lol we.
Looks to me that you're the one getting worked up here because of my opinion of you being a shifty lawyer.
Why are you and Fuzz obsessed with what people do for a living?
Calling you emotional isn't me getting worked up. It's pointing out the fact that you're getting emotional, again.
ANother thing not to do: Never visit Iran. Kidnapping and arresting Americans is a sport for them, especially since Obama keeps giving in to the terrorists.
Because they are losers and want to try to drag others down to their level. I think fuzzy calls it wishcasting.
I'm not obsessed with it. You brought it up as an appeal for authority as did vy. I could care less otherwise.
Try and keep up, dip .
crofl appeal to authority
And counselor crayola still fails to argue on merit. Notice he doesn't deny it happened. Instead he just ridicules my word choice like a simpleton.
Sorry, what was the merit in your point? All I saw was you carelessly throwing out one of your Intro to Logic 101 terms like this were the local coffee shop.
Counselor crayola apparently cannot read as I pointed out what he didn't do. Critical thinking and reading are hard.
He should have learned such things in middle school reading at the very latest.
It's also rich that a supposed lawyer is complaining that someone is using basic verbiage that as a lawyer he should already know. If I was talking to terrence or CC you would have a point but youre supposed to be a lawyer dip . Logic 101 is not pedantic in that scenario. Not my fault you don't know how to play the part.
Bet fuzzy sports skinny jeans, a beret, and has a little chin beard.
Nice. Now I'm a hipster. Like I said you peabrains trying to categorize me so as to understand me displays your limitations very clearly.
You accused me of not discussing the merits, so I'm asking you to succinctly clarify your point, Pierre.
Don't bloviate on like this is your ty grad thesis.
I totally understand you are a dip . It's your limitations, not mine.
I love how bitter little loser fuzzy is. He wasted mommy and daddy's college money and now is just a bitter little picking stupid fights on the Internet. He is boutons in 10 years just hating everyone because his life is such a pit of despair.
Pick fights? Why is it that you're here in this thread coming after me unprovoked, fattie? Who is trying to pick a 'fight?'
Again, actions speak louder than words, brother killer.
I already stated it; I even pointed it out. Your poor reading skills are not my problem.
Further it is mindlessly easy to disprove a negative. OTOH, asking me to run around and prove one is, as any lawyer should know, a waste of time.
Mentioning something hardly counts as support of it. You've still not backed up what you've said, merits-wise.
Resorting to your time honored tradition of vommitting PHL101 drivel doesn't count, sorry.
So because I don't want to repeat myself when I've already pointed out the merit that you even now refuse to address means I never made the argument?
What specifically do you think is at an entry level college level? How to prove a negative? Various fallacies? Youre still not arguing on merit but resorting completely to vitriol and incredulity as if your ignorance is the standard by which others should judge. This is boring.
If I don't respond the next time it's because you are incapable of arguing on merit and I have better things to do..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions