I want Matt Barnes's head on a pike.

[gambit1990]

Who are you and why are you salty?

not salty, tired of takes (not just from you) and threads (not just from you).

[gambit1990]

'i want kawhi to do good against a certain player, let me make a thread about it.'

[midnightpulp]

'i want kawhi to do good against a certain player, let me make a thread about it.'

As opposed to, "Patty Mills is good in the playoffs. Let me make a thread about it."

I know you didn't make that thread (if you did no one would probably read it ) but let's not act like your compatriots are constantly starting 10/10 threads.

[gambit1990]

As opposed to, "Patty Mills is good in the playoffs. Let me make a thread about it."

I know you didn't make that thread (if you did no one would probably read it ) but let's not act like your compatriots are constantly starting 10/10 threads.

my "compatriots" way to totally deflect.

dabom made a thread about patty while he was struggling and made a prediction. this ty thread is you just saying you want kawhi to play good against someone. you honestly couldn't have posted that in the game thread?

[Spurtacular]

my "compatriots" way to totally deflect.

dabom made a thread about patty while he was struggling and made a prediction. this ty thread is you just saying you want kawhi to play good against someone. you honestly couldn't have posted that in the game thread?

Go back under your bridge.

[gambit1990]

Go back under your bridge.

if anyone is curious as to how much of a joke spurtacular is:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=251276

[midnightpulp]

my "compatriots" way to totally deflect.

dabom made a thread about patty while he was struggling and made a prediction. this ty thread is you just saying you want kawhi to play good against someone. you honestly couldn't have posted that in the game thread?

Semen shielding for Dabom.

But keep using this thread to come at me because you didn't like my Parker takes. That's what this is all about.

"I-I-have to call out anyone who dare supported Parker! "

You even bumped that StartPaddyKrew thread to tell us about Patty's exceptional garbage time performance relative to Parker's. Talk about wasting bandwidth with takes.

[Spurtacular]

if anyone is curious as to how much of a joke spurtacular is:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=251276

Nobody's curious about you being krew alt. I ain't mad; just telling you to STFU.

[gambit1990]

Semen shielding for Dabom.

But keep using this thread to come at me because you didn't like my Parker takes. That's what this is all about.

"I-I-have to call out anyone who dare supported Parker! "

You even bumped that StartPaddyKrew thread to tell us about Patty's exceptional garbage time performance relative to Parker's. Talk about wasting bandwidth with takes.

you made a thread saying you want player a to play good against player b.

you're comparing that to me bumping a thread in which i stated stats.

and no, i'm not using this because your parker takes, i'm using this because it's a thread.

[gambit1990]

Nobody's curious about you being krew alt. I ain't mad; just telling you to STFU.

i'm not an alt. with your takes... i bet you wish you were an alt.

[dabom]

my "compatriots" way to totally deflect.

dabom made a thread about patty while he was struggling and made a prediction. this ty thread is you just saying you want kawhi to play good against someone. you honestly couldn't have posted that in the game thread?

[dabom]

not salty, tired of takes (not just from you) and threads (not just from you).

[gambit1990]

can't wait for mid's next great thread: "i want kevin durant's head on a pike."

[dabom]

[dabom]

Gambit taking mid's soul right now.

[midnightpulp]

you made a thread saying you want player a to play good against player b.

you're comparing that to me bumping a thread in which i stated stats.

and no, i'm not using this because your parker takes, i'm using this because it's a thread.

Why is a garbage time performance worth bumping?

This premise of this thread was highly more interesting than mentioning the fact Patty outplayed some guy named Mumford in garbage time. Reason being because of the history between Matt Barnes and Kawhi, which has become something of a running joke.

Yeah, it has everything to do with my Parker support. You have a irrational hate toward him and go at anyone suggesting he should be a key part of this upcoming playoff run.

[midnightpulp]

can't wait for mid's next great thread: "i want kevin durant's head on a pike."

You obviously can't considering how much you posted in this thread already

[gambit1990]

This premise of this thread was highly more interesting than mentioning the fact Patty outplayed some guy named Mumford in garbage time.

how about mentioning that parker outplayed farmar? what a feat.

You have a irrational hate toward him and go at anyone suggesting he should be a key part of this upcoming playoff run.

tbh, bottom line is parker is gonna have to step it up big time for us to have a chance.

mid's ignorance is showing.

[midnightpulp]

how about mentioning that parker outplayed farmar? what a feat.



mid's ignorance is showing.

Then why aren't you celebrating that fact (Parker stepping up) tonight?

Instead, you bumped the Patty thread to tell us how much better he was than Parker tonight. But it was an intellectually dishonest take because you forgot to mention the fact that 13 of Patty's 15 points came when the Spurs were already up 20. And 6 of those points came when the Spurs were up 30. If Parker got his numbers in that context, you and the Krew would be ting on it. But Patty House does it, and it's "MVPatty!"

I honestly don't give a who outplays who in that little contest, but only a frothing at the mouth Parker hater (or Patty lover) would think Patty outplayed Parker.

[gambit1990]

Instead, you bumped the Patty thread to tell us how much better he was than Parker tonight.

this is what i posted:

patty scored the same amount of points as parker. on two less shots. mills had three more rebounds. parker had four more assists but also had three more turnovers. patty had two more steals and one less foul.

nothing subjective, just facts.

[dabom]

this is what i posted:

nothing subjective, just facts.

[midnightpulp]

this is what i posted:

nothing subjective, just facts.

Boban is 3rd most impactful player in the league per one of the best metrics out there.

Nothing subjective, just facts.

Anyhow, I know what you were implying, and your implication is/was re ed.

[gambit1990]

mid melting down "i know what you were implying i have good takes and only make good threads "

bringing up patty, and then parker, and then boban

i'm giving you cause your thread. plain and simple. take another L tbh. you should be used to that by now.

[midnightpulp]

mid melting down "i know what you were implying i have good takes and only make good threads "

bringing up patty, and then parker, and then boban

i'm giving you cause your thread. plain and simple. take another L tbh. you should be used to that by now.

Deflecting with "You're melting down!" because you know your Patty take and the logic behind that take was .

[Spurtacular]

i'm not an alt. with your takes... i bet you wish you were an alt.

You're pond s .