I made a baseless claim when his TEAMMATE is claiming he was shook(Not to mention his body language)
Dumbass, you took the debate from whether Curry was shook to clamoring over a DIRECT quote. He was shook, end of story.
I made a baseless claim when his TEAMMATE is claiming he was shook(Not to mention his body language)
the debate wasn't if he shook. the debate was if "he ADMITTED to being shook"
check your first post i quoted dip
Iggy won the MVP b/c he changed the series after being inserted into the lineup, he was the only guy that gave LeBron (the one man wrecking crew) trouble. Curry could have put up his season average & it wouldn't have been enough if LeBron was having his way against Barnes.
Manu/Pau didn't shift the momentum of the series, they were just the most consistent star player.
Curry's spokesperson:
![]()
Dip , you were arguing he wasn't shook when his OWN TEAMMATE had a DIRECT quote stating he was..proceed w/ your witch hunt.![]()
you're shifting goalposts (from curry ADMITTING something to him just being shook) and then playing the bull "curry's spokesperson card"... take the L
The Grizzlies series happened when Draymond had to take a depressed Curry to a bar.
You shifted the goalpost asking for a direct quote from Curry instead of his designated spokesperson. You're basically trying to find a way out of this by changing the subject from whether he was shook to witch hunting for a quote.
of course i asked for a direct quote. you specifically said "curry ADMITTED the pressure got to him"
"designated spokesperson" get that outta here
you made a baseless claim, i called it out, and now you're just chasing your tail around
Curry fessed up to Draymond & the spokesperson relayed the message to the media. Draymond is a straight shooter while Curry is Mr. PC.
Your age and/or maturity shows every time you enter a conversation.
It doesn't matter, Curry averaged way better numbers and without him the Warriors wouldn't have won that series. Without Iggy, it would have been more difficult but chances are the Warriors would have still outlasted a depleted Cavs team.
BTW, explain me again how the Spurs match up so well with OKC and will win the series in 5.
If we're going by numbers then Tim had better numbers than Manu & Kirby had better numbers than Pau.
BTW, explain me again how the Spurs match up so well with OKC and will win the series in 5.
That doesn't explain what I asked, tbh.
And no, if you pay attention, Timmy didn't have better numbers than Manu and Kobe didn't have better numbers than Pau.
Curry outplayed Iggy by a way bigger margin than any of the others did with their counterparts.
P/S: After being so brutally proven wrong in the thing that you argued the most this season, you should probably lay low for a while with the whole arguing thing, tbh. Specially against me, that I'm rarely wrong, tbph.
Bruh, if LMA was going to turn into Softridge when the going got tough then we argued about NOTHING. There is no way they are beating Wardell's squad even if they got a BYE to the WCF w/ that playing wingman.
If it makes you happy then go ahead & throw yourself a party just like LMA does when he gets bounced in the 2nd rd.
I have already replied the LA angle in the other thread. And yes, you better stop spinning and acknowledge that I owned you on this one. You are lucky that I don't remeber which thread it was that we went back and forth arguing this matchup 'cause I remember many pretty painful quotes. It's not like I didn't warn you son, very rarely I'm wrong about something I have a strong feeling about, tbh.
Go pop champagne chump
Will do after we win game 7![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)