Talk about a truth nuke..
He shot over 50% from 3 in the playoffs
Some of you guys need to understand the difference between role players and stars..you won't find role players that consistently show up on offense, that's part of the reason they are just role players..
Last edited by HarlemHeat37; 06-30-2016 at 08:39 PM.
oh look I found 4 morons who should just kill themselves
Talk about a truth nuke..
I didn't edit the above in any way other than adding the bold. True story.
Nice. Properly imbalanced, just like I expected.
Kill yourself
Uh huh... and? Go on.
real truth nuke here. I see why Chinook gets so defensive of Green. so many morons that post in these anti Green threadsHe shot over 50% from 3 in the playoffs
Some of you guys need to understand the difference between role players and stars..you won't find role players that consistently show up on offense, that's part of the reason they are just role players..
^^Hating on Green is fine, I can understand people that are frustrated with his inconsistency and inability to handle the ball..
The problem is virtually all the Green haters want to replace him with inferior role players that have the same issues with inconsistency
The Cavs just won a le with Richard Jefferson as their best perimeter role player
Simpletons love volume stats rather than going game by game. I feel you, brother.
Why don't you go look at the OKC series and tell me how consistently good Danny was throughout that series.
told you to kill yourself, got. done talking to you
I actually don't want him replaced at all, personally. I'm just calling a spade a spade.^^Hating on Green is fine, I can understand people that are frustrated with his inconsistency and inability to handle the ball..
The problem is virtually all the Green haters want to replace him with inferior role players that have the same issues with inconsistency
Hurts when you bleed, doesn't it?
That's fine. These anti Green threads are just so ing repe ive. It must be how Parker fans feel like with all the anti Parker threads^^Hating on Green is fine, I can understand people that are frustrated with his inconsistency and inability to handle the ball..
The problem is virtually all the Green haters want to replace him with inferior role players that have the same issues with inconsistency
Yeah...people are morons and should kill themselves if they have a different opinion from yours!
He's "regulating".
No one outside of Kawhi & LMA in the first half of the series was good. Danny isn't supposed to be saviour especially in the playoffs although he's played that role many times.
He also played incredible defense which again no one values.
Mount up!
Green had the highest adjusted on/off of any Spur in the OKC series, along with shooting over 50% from 3..only Kawhi and Aldridge had positive on/off numbers among all other Spurs in the series
Best offseason post so far.
No argument there. It's obviously why Pop keeps him on the floor and he shows his defensive value over and over.
His offensive value is like playing a bad scratch off though and at times, his D just cannot make up for it.
Like I said though, and especially for the price being paid- I wouldn't replace the man. The guy needs to seriously work on some basic facets of the game, though.
It's also completely obvious that Pop keeps him on the floor for D and considers his O pure gravy in how short a leash he keeps on him when he blows a D assignment.
Danny is not on the floor to shoot, he's on the floor to D up.
He doesn't play incredible defense consistently. I don't know why you keep pushing this. He is very bad at defense sometimes too. His inconsistency can be in the same game too.
We aren't going to agree on this one my friend.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
