Trump: meetin w intel chiefs constructive, Russia hd absolutely no effect on election

[Th'Pusher]

Who was Comey investigating and why?

Hillary Clinton for potential mishandling of classified information.

Who's emails were being leaked?

John Podesta's

Were the emails doctored?

This is unknown.

Were the emails obtained illegally?

[boutons_deux]

Trump mentioned Wikileaks 164 times in last month of election, now claims it didn’t impact one voter

“Boy, that Wikileaks has done a job on her, hasn’t it?”

Trump talked extensively about Wikileaks in the final days of a campaign that was ultimately decided by just 100,000 votes in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania combined.

Trump moderated his stance. In a statement, Trump did not explicitly say the hacks were the work of Russian operatives, but also did not deny their involvement.

Instead, Trump honed in on a different argument: Whoever was responsible, the information that was hacked and then distributed through Wikileaks had “absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election.”

Trump claims this is the view of the intelligence community. That is false.

intelligence agencies said that “[w]e did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election.”

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-ment...002#.3yp0oj7jm

[Winehole23]

Originally Posted by TheSanityAnnex Were the emails doctored?

This is unknown.

The just released DNI report suggests the emails were bona fide.

[DMC]

Hillary Clinton for potential mishandling of classified information.

John Podesta's

This is unknown.

Were the emails obtained illegally?

By whom? The FBI? They were stored illegally, that much we know.

[Th'Pusher]

By whom? The FBI? They were stored illegally, that much we know.

John Podesta's emails were stored illegally?

[Th'Pusher]

The just released DNI report suggests the emails were bona fide.

Will take your word for it.

[Winehole23]

You needn't.

https://www.do entcloud.org/do e...ng-report.html

[DMC]

The just released DNI report suggests the emails were bona fide.

Not according to Donna Brazile. They are doctored.

[Th'Pusher]

You needn't.

https://www.do entcloud.org/do e...ng-report.html

Will continue to take your word for it until I can read in full. Have only heard/read the highlights.

[DMC]

Who knew non-allied foreign governments want to steal US information or tamper with our system? Makes sense that the Sec of State would have all of hers on a private server in her bathroom, those are hard to find.

[Th'Pusher]

Who knew non-allied foreign governments want to steal US information or tamper with our system? Makes sense that the Sec of State would have all of hers on a private server in her bathroom, those are hard to find.

all of hers

[DMC]

John Podesta's emails were stored illegally?

Who obtained them illegally? Was it the FBI?

Comey was investigating Hillary's private server.

[DMC]

all of hers

Stick to the questions I posed before you try to be cute.

While you have this time, read the doc Winehole offered instead of taking the lazy, hedging way out.

[Th'Pusher]

Who obtained them illegally? Was it the FBI?

. FBI? His email was hacked.

Comey was investigating Hillary's private server.

No . I literally just said that in the post you responded to.

[Th'Pusher]

Stick to the questions I posed before you try to be cute.

While you have this time, read the doc Winehole offered instead of taking the lazy, hedging way out.

NM

[DMC]

. FBI? His email was hacked.

Yes the FBI, that's what you responded to. You acted as if the FBI had illegally obtained the emails.

Is this the Th'Pusher rodeo starting up again?

No . I literally just said that in the post you responded to.

Yet you act like Podesta was on trial.

[Th'Pusher]

Yes the FBI, that's what you responded to. You acted as if the FBI had illegally obtained the emails.

Read again. I answered three questions posed by TSA and then asked a question of my own.

Yet you act like Podesta was on trial.

In what way?

[in2deep]

Apparently Fridays report was cooked/rigged.

its not even a standard security report. Usually all 17 intelligence US agencies have to sign off on it. This report was only signed off by 3 out of the 17.

its basically Obamas last joke

[Winehole23]

what's a standard security report and where did you hear that?

[boutons_deux]

Trump Chief Of Staff Turned Into A Defenseless Mess When Forced To Admit Russian Hacking

Trump's incoming chief of staff, Reince Priebus, did everything he could to point the finger at the DNC but was eventually forced to admit that Russia was responsible for the hacking and election meddling during an interview on Fox News Sunday.

http://www.politicususa.com/2017/01/08/trump-chief-staff-turned-defenseless-mess-forced-admit-russian-hacking.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed &utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Polit icus+USA+%29

When Fox's Trash supporters get screwed by Trash and his administration, will Fox stick with Trash or stick with their viewers?

[HI-FI]

Apparently Fridays report was cooked/rigged.

its not even a standard security report. Usually all 17 intelligence US agencies have to sign off on it. This report was only signed off by 3 out of the 17.

its basically Obamas last joke

[DMC]

Read again. I answered three questions posed by TSA and then asked a question of my own.

Yep, you're starting the rodeo again where you dodge and deflect and Chumpdumber your way through 12 pages of .

I asked you a question.. obtained illegally by whom? TSA was talking about the FBI investigation, who were you talking about?

In what way?

By saying his emails were illegally obtained. What way do you think?

If someone stole a computer from your home and found child porn on it then dropped that off with authorities, even anonymously, you'd have to answer some questions. The police didn't obtain it illegally and the FBI didn't obtain emails illegally.

[Th'Pusher]

Yep, you're starting the rodeo again where you dodge and deflect and Chumpdumber your way through 12 pages of .

I asked you a question.. obtained illegally by whom? TSA was talking about the FBI investigation, who were you talking about?

By saying his emails were illegally obtained. What way do you think?

If someone stole a computer from your home and found child porn on it then dropped that off with authorities, even anonymously, you'd have to answer some questions. The police didn't obtain it illegally and the FBI didn't obtain emails illegally.

Russian hackers were responsible for illegally obtaining the emails.

I don't know why you and TSA conflate the FBI investigation into Hillary's emails and John Podesta's email hack. They were two wholly separate events and issues.

[DMC]

Russian hackers were responsible for illegally obtaining the emails.

I don't know why you and TSA conflate the FBI investigation into Hillary's emails and John Podesta's email hack. They were two wholly separate events and issues.

Because the FBI wasn't investigating John Podesta. Why does the legality of how the emails were originally obtained mean anything to the investigation? The FBI didn't care about what Donna Brazile gave Hillary or that Podesta called Chelsea a brat or whatever he called her. They were instead concerned about classified information being on public servers. From this angle Podesta's emails are inseparable from those on Hillary bathroom server from Colorado.

Weiner's estranged wife is Clinton adviser Huma Abedin. And in their look into Weiner's sexting allegations, which began on September 22, investigators from the FBI's New York field office discovered Abedin's emails on Weiner's laptop -- with initial data showing those emails went through Clinton's server.

What was obtained illegally?

[spurraider21]

abedin/weiner emails tied back to the clinton server investigation... but again is independent of the podesta hack

again, the wikileaks dumps were all from the podesta emails, none of the wikileaks stuff were related to the weiner/abdin/clinton server investigation